Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Objectives: To compare medication errors identified at audit and via direct observation with medication errors reported to an incident reporting system at paediatric hospitals and to investigate differences in types and severity of errors detected and reported by staff.

Methods: This is a comparison study at two tertiary referral paediatric hospitals between 2016 and 2020 in Australia. Prescribing errors were identified from a medication chart audit of 7785 patient records. Medication administration errors were identified from a prospective direct observational study of 5137 medication administration doses to 1530 patients. Medication errors reported to the hospitals' incident reporting system were identified and matched with errors identified at audit and observation.

Results: Of 11 302 clinical prescribing errors identified at audit, 3.2 per 1000 errors (95% CI 2.3 to 4.4, n=36) had an incident report. Of 2224 potentially serious prescribing errors from audit, 26.1% (95% CI 24.3 to 27.9, n=580) were detected by staff and 11.2 per 1000 errors (95% CI 7.6 to 16.5, n=25) were reported to the incident system. Although the prescribing error detection rates varied between the two hospitals, there was no difference in incident reporting rates regardless of error severity. Of 40 errors associated with actual patient harm, only 7 (17.5%; 95% CI 8.7% to 31.9%) were detected by staff and 4 (10.0%; 95% CI 4.0% to 23.1%) had an incident report. None of the 2883 clinical medication administration errors observed, including 903 potentially serious errors and 144 errors associated with actual patient harm, had incident reports.

Conclusion: Incident reporting data do not provide an accurate reflection of medication errors and related harm to children in hospitals. Failure to detect medication errors is likely to be a significant contributor to low error reporting rates. In an era of electronic health records, new automated approaches to monitor medication safety should be pursued to provide real-time monitoring.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11503142PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2023-016711DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

medication errors
24
errors identified
24
incident reporting
20
errors
18
identified audit
16
detected staff
12
reported incident
12
prescribing errors
12
medication administration
12
medication
11

Similar Publications

Antimicrobial resistance is largely driven by overuse of antibiotics, which is particularly common in low- and middle-income countries. We combine provider knowledge assessments and over 2000 anonymous standardized patient visits to providers in India to examine why they overprescribe antibiotics for pediatric diarrhea and figure out how to reduce overprescribing. Seventy percent of providers prescribed antibiotics without indication of bacterial infection.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Evaluating the quality, feasibility and patient satisfaction of medication history taking by telephone for patients with scheduled admissions: a pilot study.

Int J Clin Pharm

September 2025

Heidelberg University, Medical Faculty Heidelberg / Heidelberg University Hospital, Internal Medicine IX - Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, Cooperation Unit Clinical Pharmacy, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.

Introduction: Medication history taking at hospital admission is still prone to errors. Despite numerous quality improvement initiatives, new strategies to improve medication history taking are still sought and evaluated. Unfortunately, the gold standard research methodology for evaluation is resource-intensive, as it requires each patient to complete two medication history interviews.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the risk of selected adverse outcomes for older adults with a new episode of neck pain (NP) receiving chiropractic care compared to those receiving primary medical care with Prescription Drug Therapy (PDT) or primary care without medication.

Methods: Through analysis of Medicare claims data, we designed a retrospective cohort study including 291 604 patients with a new office visit for NP in 2019. We developed 3 mutually exclusive exposure groups: the Chiropractic Manipulative Therapy (CMT) group received spinal manipulative therapy from a chiropractor with no primary care visits; the PDT group visited primary care and filled an analgesic prescription within 7 days without chiropractic care, and the Primary Care Only (PCO) group visited primary care without chiropractic care or analgesic prescriptions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: This study assessed the prevalence and incidence of potentially inappropriate medication use for older patients undergoing surgery and its association with polypharmacy.

Methods: A retrospective, population-based cohort study with patients ≥ 65 undergoing first surgery at Landspitali-The National University Hospital of Iceland from 2005 to 2018. Participants were categorized by number of medications filled before and following their surgical episode into: non-polypharmacy (< 5), polypharmacy (5-9), and hyper-polypharmacy (≥ 10).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: Missed Nursing Care (MNC) is increasingly recognized as an indicator of care quality and a potential contributor to adverse events. This systematic review aimed to explore the correlation between MNC and adverse events in hospitalized patients across public and private settings.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF