A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Application of electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy for determining the relative nanoenvironment fluidity of polymeric micelles. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Polymeric micelles are nanocarriers for drug, protein and gene delivery due to their unique core/shell structure, which encapsulates and protects therapeutic cargos with diverse physicochemical properties. However, information regarding the micellar nanoenvironment's fluidity can provide unique insight into their makeup. In this study, we used electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy to study free radical spin probe (5-doxylstearate methyl ester, 5-MDS, and 16-doxylstearic acid, 16-DS) behaviour in methoxy-poly(ethylene oxide)-poly(α-benzyl carboxylate-ε-caprolactone) (PEO-PBCL) and methoxy-poly(ethylene oxide)-poly(ε-caprolactone) (PEO-PCL) polymeric micelles. Spin probes provided information about the spectroscopic rotational correlation time (τ, s) and the spectroscopic partition parameter F. We hypothesized that spin probes would partition into the polymeric micelles, and these parameters would be calculated. The results showed that both 5-MDS and 16-DS spectra were modulated in the presence of polymeric micelles. Based on τ values, 5-MDS revealed that PEO-PCL (τ = 3.92 ± 0.26 × 10 s) was more fluid than PEO-PBCL (τ = 7.15 ± 0.63 × 10 s). The F parameter, however, could not be calculated due to the rotational hindrance of the probe within the micelles. With 16-DS, more probe rotation was observed, and although the F parameter could be calculated, it was not helpful to distinguish the micelles' fluidity. Also, doxorubicin-loading interfered with the spin probes, particularly for 16-DS. However, using simulations, we could distinguish the hydrophilic and hydrophobic components of the 16-DS probe. The findings suggest that EPR spectroscopy is a valuable method for determining core fluidity in polymeric micelles.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00249-024-01706-yDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

polymeric micelles
24
spin probes
12
electron paramagnetic
8
paramagnetic resonance
8
fluidity polymeric
8
epr spectroscopy
8
parameter calculated
8
16-ds probe
8
micelles
7
polymeric
6

Similar Publications