98%
921
2 minutes
20
Purpose: Prostate cancer (PCa) histology, particularly the Gleason score, is an independent prognostic predictor in PCa. Little is known about the inter-reader variability in grading of targeted prostate biopsy based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The aim of this study was to assess inter-reader variability in Gleason grading of MRI-targeted biopsy among uropathologists and its potential impact on a population-based randomized PCa screening trial (ProScreen).
Methods: From June 2014 to May 2018, 100 men with clinically suspected PCa were retrospectively selected. All men underwent prostate MRI and 86 underwent targeted prostate of the prostate. Six pathologists individually reviewed the pathology slides of the prostate biopsies. The five-tier ISUP (The International Society of Urological Pathology) grade grouping (GG) system was used. Fleiss' weighted kappa (κ) and Model-based kappa for associations were computed to estimate the combined agreement between individual pathologists.
Results: GG reporting of targeted prostate was highly consistent among the trial pathologists. Inter-reader agreement for cancer (GG1-5) vs. benign was excellent (Model-based kappa 0.90, Fleiss' kappa κ = 0.90) and for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) (GG2-5 vs. GG0 vs. GG1), it was good (Model-based kappa 0.70, Fleiss' kappa κ 0.67).
Conclusions: Inter-reader agreement in grading of MRI-targeted biopsy was good to excellent, while it was fair to moderate for MRI in the same cohort, as previously shown. Importantly, there was wide consensus by pathologists in assigning the contemporary GG on MRI-targeted biopsy suggesting high reproducibility of pathology reporting in the ProScreen trial.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10998811 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-024-04898-2 | DOI Listing |
J Clin Med
August 2025
Department of Paediatric Radiology, Medical University of Bialystok, 17 Waszyngtona St., 15-274 Bialystok, Poland.
Accurate histopathological grading of prostate cancer at the time of biopsy is essential for guiding treatment decisions and minimizing the risks of both overtreatment and undertreatment. A key challenge in prostate cancer diagnostics is the phenomenon of upgrading, wherein the cancer appears more aggressive in the radical prostatectomy specimen than initially indicated by biopsy. Such discrepancies can compromise therapeutic planning.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPathophysiology
August 2025
Department of Urology, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science, and Technology of Targu Mures, 540139 Targu Mures, Romania.
Secondary lymphoma of the prostate is described as the involvement of the prostate gland by lymphomatous spread from a primary site. This condition is exceedingly rare and often presents diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. The symptoms often mimic those of benign prostatic hyperplasia or prostate cancer, including LUTS (lower urinary tract symptoms) and even complete urinary retention.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWorld J Urol
August 2025
Department of Urology, Jules Bordet Institute-Erasme Hospital, Brussels University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.
Purpose: Current risk stratification systems for prostate cancer (PCa) lack precision, particularly for intermediate-risk patients. PTEN loss has emerged as a promising biomarker for predicting aggressive disease. This study aims to evaluate the prognostic value of PTEN status in patients diagnosed via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted biopsy and treated with radical prostatectomy (RP).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBJU Int
August 2025
Department of Paediatrics, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth (Deemed-to-be-University), Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Br J Radiol
July 2025
Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Türkiye.
Objectives: The study aims to evaluate PI-RADS 4 lesions, including those with primary diffusion restriction (diffusion-weighted imaging score 4) and those upgraded from PI-RADS 3 due to positive dynamic contrast-enhanced findings, and to compare outcomes between these groups while also assessing cancer detection rates and prostatitis between upgraded cases and PI-RADS 3 lesions.
Methods: In this single-center cohort study, peripheral zone lesions classified as PI-RADS 3 and 4 by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and biopsied via MRI/Transrectal ultrasound-guided targeted biopsy were analyzed.
Results: Of 420 peripheral zone lesions from 272 patients, 202 were PI-RADS 3, 81 PI-RADS 3 + 1, and 137 PI-RADS 4.