Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Aim: As multidisciplinary treatment strategies for colorectal cancer have improved, aggressive surgical resection has become commonplace. Multivisceral and extended resections offer curative-intent resection with significant survival benefit. However, limited data exist regarding the feasibility and oncological efficacy of performing extended resection via a minimally invasive approach. The aim of this study was to determine the perioperative and long-term outcomes following robotic extended resection for colorectal cancer.

Method: We describe the population of patients undergoing robotic multivisceral resection for colorectal cancer at our single institution. We evaluated perioperative details and investigated short- and long-term outcomes, using the Kaplan-Meier method to analyse overall and recurrence-free survival.

Results: Among the 86 patients most tumours were T3 (47%) or T4 (47%) lesions in the rectum (78%). Most resections involved the anterior compartment (72%): bladder (n = 13), seminal vesicle/vas deferens (n = 27), ureter (n = 6), prostate (n = 15) and uterus/vagina/adnexa (n = 27). Three cases required conversion to open surgery; 10 patients had grade 3 complications. The median hospital stay was 4 days. Resections were R0 (>1 mm) in 78 and R1 (0 to ≤1 mm) in 8, with none being R2. The average nodal yield was 26 and 48 (55.8%) were pN0. Three-year overall survival was 88% and median progression-free survival was 19.4 months. Local recurrence was 6.1% and distant recurrence was 26.1% at 3 years.

Conclusion: Performance of multivisceral and extended resection on the robotic platform allows patients the benefit of minimally invasive surgery while achieving oncologically sound resection of colorectal cancer.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11884874PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/codi.16964DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

resection colorectal
16
colorectal cancer
16
extended resection
12
outcomes robotic
8
resection
8
multivisceral resection
8
multivisceral extended
8
minimally invasive
8
long-term outcomes
8
colorectal
5

Similar Publications

Background: The optimal management of synchronous rectal cancer (RC) and prostate cancer (PC) remains unclear. This systematic review evaluates treatment strategies and reports postoperative, oncological, and quality-of-life outcomes in patients treated with curative intent.

Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, this systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024598049).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

We report a case of vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome in a 30-year-old male patient. He presented to his local doctor with sudden onset of epicardial pain at around 5:00 p.m.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: To compare the short-term outcomes of robotic abdominoperineal resection with laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection in patients with rectal cancer.

Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane through March 2024 following PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO number: CRD42024520671). Randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized studies comparing short-term outcomes between the 2 approaches were selected.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Appendiceal neuroendocrine neoplasms are rare lesions which are generally incidentally discovered during or after appendectomies. Recent advances have refined their classification and improved diagnostic rates, highlighting their distinct pathologic and clinical presentations. The present study aimed to assess the characteristics and outcomes of appendiceal neuroendocrine neoplasms using data from the U.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To build computed tomography (CT)-based radiomics models, with independent external validation, to predict recurrence and disease-specific mortality in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) who underwent liver resection.

Methods: 113 patients were included in this retrospective study: the internal training cohort comprised 66 patients, while the external validation cohort comprised 47. All patients underwent a CT study before surgery.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF