Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Noninvasive imaging methods, either anatomical or functional tests, serve as essential instruments for the appropriate management of patients with established or suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). We sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) plus stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (S-CMR) strategy in patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS). Patients with suspected CCS showing intermediate coronary plaques (stenosis 30-70%) at CCTA underwent S-CMR. Patients with a positive S-CMR were referred to invasive coronary angiography (ICA) plus instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR), and myocardial revascularization if recommended. All patients received guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT), including high-dose statins, regardless of myocardial revascularization. The primary endpoint was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and unplanned revascularization. According to the results of CCTA, 62 patients showing intermediate coronary plaques underwent S-CMR, which was positive for a myocardial perfusion deficit in = 17 (27%) and negative in = 45 (73%) patients. According to the results of ICA plus iFR, revascularization was performed in 13 patients. No differences in the primary endpoint between the positive and negative S-CMR groups were observed at 1 year (1 [5.9%] vs. 1 [2.2%], = 0.485) and after a median of 33.4 months (2 [11.8%] vs. 3 [6.7%]; = 0.605). Our study suggests that a CCTA plus S-CMR strategy is effective for the evaluation of patients with suspicion of CCS at low-intermediate risk, and it may help to refine the selection of patients with intermediate coronary plaques at CCTA needing coronary revascularization.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10971722PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm13061556DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

intermediate coronary
12
coronary plaques
12
patients
11
coronary
10
coronary computed
8
computed tomography
8
tomography angiography
8
stress cardiac
8
cardiac magnetic
8
magnetic resonance
8

Similar Publications

Background: Traditional cardiovascular risk assessment entails investigator-defined exposure levels and individual risk markers in multivariable analysis. We sought to determine whether an alternative unbiased learning analysis might provide further insights into vascular risk.

Methods: We conducted an unsupervised learning (k-means cluster) analysis in the Women's Health Study (N=26 443) using baseline levels of triglycerides, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol to form novel exposures.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Comparison of Anatomical and Physiological Indices of Angiographically Intermediate Left Main Coronary Artery Stenoses.

Am J Cardiol

September 2025

Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey; Department of Cardiology, Acibadem International Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey. Electronic address:

Although physiologic evaluation (e.g., fractional flow reserve) of intermediate lesions is well established in other coronary arteries, the left main coronary artery (LMCA) exhibits diagnostic challenges, hindering development of physiology-based decision-making algorithms.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Prognosis of HPV-independent, p53-wild-type vulvar squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Gynecol Oncol

September 2025

Pathology Unit, Department of Oncology, ASST Sette Laghi, Varese, Italy; Department of Medicine and Technological Innovation, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy. Electronic address:

Background: Vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC) is subdivided into TP53-mutant (TP53) and HPV-associated (HPV). In recent years, a third group unrelated to TP53 mutation or HPV-association (TP53/HPV) has emerged. However, its prognosis is unclear.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Angiography-derived radial wall strain (RWS) estimates the radial coronary wall deformation caused by pulsatile blood pressure, whereas superficial wall stress (SWS) summarizes the comprehensive wall deformation caused by both blood pressure and cardiac motion. This study sought to investigate the difference between RWS and SWS for the association with plaque vulnerability and the impact of cardiac motion on RWS.

Methods: Concurrent RWS, cardiac motion-induced bending angle change (ΔCBA), SWS, and optical coherence tomography image analyses were retrospectively performed in 49 eligible intermediate coronary lesions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF