98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: Experimental research evaluating differences between the visceral and somatic stimulation is limited to pain and typically uses different induction methods for visceral and somatic stimulation (e.g., rectal balloon distention vs. tactile hand stimulation). Our study aimed to compare differences in response time, intensity, unpleasantness, and threat between identical electrical visceral and somatic stimulations at both painful and non-painful perceptual thresholds.
Methods: Electrical stimulation was applied to the wrist and distal esophagus in 20 healthy participants. A double pseudorandom staircase determined perceptual thresholds of Sensation, Discomfort, and Pain for the somatic and visceral stimulations, separately. Stimulus reaction time (ms, via button press), and intensity, unpleasantness, and threat ratings were recorded after each stimulus. General linear mixed models compared differences in the four outcomes by stimulation type, threshold, and the stimulation type-by-threshold interaction. Sigmoidal maximum effect models evaluated differences in outcomes across all delivered stimulation intensities.
Key Results: Overall, visceral stimulations were perceived as more intense, threatening, and unpleasant compared to somatic stimulations, but participants responded faster to somatic stimulations. There was no significant interaction effect, but planned contrasts demonstrated differences at individual thresholds. Across all delivered intensities, higher intensity stimulations were needed to reach the half-maximum effect of self-reported intensity, unpleasantness, and threat ratings in the visceral domain.
Conclusions And Inferences: Differences exist between modalities for both non-painful and painful sensations. These findings may have implications for translating paradigms and behavioral treatments from the somatic domain to the visceral domain, though future research in larger clinical samples is needed.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nmo.14787 | DOI Listing |
Mol Pain
September 2025
Department of Anatomy, School of Medicine, Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran.
Pain stands as one of the main factors related to human disability and suffering, with different classifications (e.g., acute/chronic, somatic/visceral, and malignant/non-malignant).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMol Oncol
September 2025
Department of Internal Medicine - Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Brno and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Retroelements in the human genome are silenced via multiple mechanisms, including DNA methylation, to prevent their potential mutagenic effect. Retroelement activity, demonstrated by their expression and somatic retrotransposition events, was shown to be deregulated in multiple tumors but not yet in leukemia. We hypothesized that treatment with hypomethylating agents, commonly used in myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemia, could lead to increased retroelement activity and somatic retrotranspositions, thus contributing to disease progression.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAm J Obstet Gynecol
July 2025
Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.
Optimal neuraxial anesthesia for cesarean delivery requires a thorough understanding of patient, obstetrical, surgical, and anesthesia-related factors which can impact pain during and after cesarean delivery. While not all cesarean deliveries are the same from an obstetrical standpoint, not all anesthetics provide the same degree of anesthetic blockade and postcesarean analgesia; therefore, context is crucial to provide patients with a safe and pain-free experience. Communication between obstetrical and anesthesia teams is key to ensure that the anesthetic approach is tailored to the clinical scenario, particularly if emergency cesarean delivery is needed, and follows best practices for cesarean delivery anesthesia.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFZhen Ci Yan Jiu
August 2025
School of Acupuncture-moxibustion and Tuina, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, China.
The insular cortex contains corresponding somatosensory region and visceral motor region, which respectively process somatic and visceral information. Through short-range fiber projections, it can integrate somatosensory information and modulate visceral functions. The insular cortex has a close connection with the autonomic nervous system and is a key hub for regulating the autonomic nervous system, making it a potential target for revealing the correlation between acupoints and internal organs.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCureus
July 2025
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Children's Memorial Health Institute, Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Scientific Circle English Division (ANKONA ED) Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, POL.
The quadratus lumborum block (QLB) is a common regional anesthesia technique for abdominal and pelvic surgeries. Unlike traditional blocks (e.g.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF