Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
As an essential procedure, wound care comes with acute pain, which is short but high in intensity, causing patients to fear and affecting subsequent treatment. Nitrous oxide (NO) is used to relieve pain related to wound care; however, evidence regarding its application is conflicting. Thus, this systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy of NO in wound care-related pain. Randomized controlled trials that investigated the effect of NO in adults undergoing wound care were systematically searched from PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov up to February 2023. The primary outcome was the pain score. Secondary outcomes included patients' satisfaction and side effects. Through screening the 265 identified articles, seven and six studies were finally included in the systematic review and meta-analysis, respectively. Pooled analysis suggested that there was no significant difference in reducing wound care-related pain between the NO group and the control group (mean difference [MD], -0.02, 95% confidence interval [CI], -1.46, 1.42; = 0.98, = 96%). Subgroup analyses indicated that there was a significant difference in favor of NO for burns, not for ulcers, and NO was superior to oxygen and similar to topical or intravenous anesthesia. There was no significant difference in patients' satisfaction or the incidence of side effects between groups. This review suggests that NO might be effective for pain management in patients undergoing wound care. Caution must be taken when interpreting these results due to the high risk of biased methods in the included studies.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/wound.2023.0211 | DOI Listing |