Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Anakinra and tocilizumab are used for severe Covid-19, but only one previous randomized controlled trial (RCT) has studied both. We performed a multi-center RCT comparing anakinra or tocilizumab versus usual care (UC) for adults at high risk of deterioration.

Methods: The study was conducted June 2020 to March 2021. Eligibility required ≥ 5 liters/minute of Oxygen to maintain peripheral oxygen saturation at ≥ 93%, CRP > 70 mg/L, ferritin > 500 μg/L and at least two points where one point was awarded for lymphocytes < 1x 109/L; D-dimer ≥ 0.5 mg/L and; lactate dehydrogenase ≥ 8 microkatal/L. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive either a single dose of tocilizumab (8 mg/kg) or anakinra 100 mg IV QID for seven days or UC alone. The primary outcome was time to recovery.

Results: Recruitment was ended prematurely when tocilizumab became part of usual care. Out of a planned 195 patients, 77 had been randomized, 27 to UC, 28 to anakinra and 22 to tocilizumab. Median time to recovery was 15, 15 and 11 days. Rate ratio for recovery for UC vs anakinra was 0.91, 0.47 to 1.78, 95% [CI], p = 0.8 and for UC vs tocilizumab 1.13, 0.55 to 2.30; p = 0.7. There were non-significant trends favoring tocilizumab (and to limited degree anakinra) vs UC for some secondary outcomes. Safety profiles did not differ significantly.

Conclusion: Premature closure of trial precludes firm conclusions. Anakinra or tocilizumab did not significantly shorten time to clinical recovery compared to usual care. (IMMCoVA, NCT04412291, EudraCT: 2020-00174824).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10756513PMC
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0295838PLOS

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

anakinra tocilizumab
20
usual care
12
anakinra
8
severe covid-19
8
high risk
8
randomized controlled
8
tocilizumab
8
tocilizumab patients
4
patients admitted
4
admitted hospital
4

Similar Publications

Update in new-onset refractory status epilepticus and febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome.

Curr Opin Pediatr

August 2025

Division of Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Purpose Of Review: New-onset refractory status epileptics (NORSE) and a subset, febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES), are rare clinical presentations with rapid onset, cryptogenic etiology, unpredictable course, and long-standing neurologic sequalae. International consensus recommendations were published in 2022 to aid in diagnosis, treatment, and research of NORSE/FIRES. Subsequently, there have been advances in understanding both the pathophysiology and the efficacy of immunotherapies.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Influenza-Associated Acute Necrotizing Encephalopathy in US Children.

JAMA

August 2025

Department of Neurology and Pediatric Neuroimmunology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Importance: Acute necrotizing encephalopathy (ANE) is a rare, but severe, neurologic condition for which epidemiologic and management data remain limited. During the 2024-2025 US influenza season, clinicians at large pediatric centers anecdotally reported an increased number of children with influenza-associated ANE, prompting this national investigation.

Objective: To understand the clinical presentation, interventions, and outcomes among US children diagnosed with influenza-associated ANE.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Atherosclerosis is a chronic, progressive vascular disease characterized not only by lipid accumulation but also by sustained inflammation. Recent evidence has highlighted the critical role of immune pathways and pro-inflammatory cytokines in plaque formation, progression, and destabilization.

Aim: This narrative review aims to summarize current knowledge regarding the role of inflammation in atherosclerosis and evaluate the therapeutic potential of biologic agents targeting specific inflammatory pathways.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Systematic Review of Adverse Events of IL-1 and IL-6 Inhibitor Use in Pediatrics.

J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther

April 2025

Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry (AP, NC, FG-B), Western University, Department of Pediatrics (FG-B), Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.

Objective: Two, relatively new and potent, classes of biologicals are interleukin-6 (IL-6) and interleukin-1 (IL-1) inhibitors. As the use of these biologicals in children is more recent, the nature and incidence of adverse effects in the pediatric population are less well known. We systematically reviewed the available literature to elucidate the risks of IL-1 and IL-6 inhibitor use in the pediatric population.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Emerging evidence suggests that cryptogenic new-onset refractory status epilepticus (c-NORSE) arises from innate immunity dysfunction leading to exacerbated inflammation. While immunotherapies have been administered, their efficacy remains variable and unpredictable.

Methods: We conducted a comprehensive literature review of studies reporting inflammation biomarkers in patients with NORSE or evaluating targeted immunotherapies.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF