Clinical implications of wheezing in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

J Thorac Dis

Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, South Korea.

Published: November 2023


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Studies on the prevalence of wheezing in both the asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) overlap (ACO) and non-ACO groups, as well as the clinical characteristics of wheezing patients in each group, are rare. We examined the prevalence of wheezing in ACO patients and non-ACO patients, respectively. In addition, we aimed to determine clinical characteristics of patients with wheezing compared to those without wheezing in the ACO and non-ACO groups.

Methods: We analyzed the data from the Korean COPD Subgroup Study (KOCOSS), a multicenter prospective cohort. We classified patients into four groups according to whether they were ACO patients or had self-reported wheezing based on the patient's answer to the COPD-specific version of St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ-C): ACO with wheezing, ACO without wheezing, non-ACO with wheezing, and non-ACO without wheezing. Clinical characteristics and exacerbations during 1-year follow up were compared among four groups.

Results: Wheezing was present in about 56% of patients in the ACO and non-ACO groups. In both groups, patients with wheezing exhibited more severe symptoms, worse lung function, and a higher risk of exacerbation than those without wheezing. There was no association between blood eosinophil count and wheezing in both the ACO and non-ACO groups. During 1-year follow-up, the ACO with wheezing group experienced exacerbations the most frequently, followed by the non-ACO with wheezing group. Moreover, wheezing was an independent predictor of the risk of exacerbation in patients with COPD, irrespective of both the ACO phenotype and the severity of airflow limitation. The exacerbation risk was higher in COPD patients who experienced wheezing more frequently.

Conclusions: Wheezing, reflecting more prominent airflow limitation and predicting exacerbation development, may serve as a severe phenotype of COPD rather than being indicative of an ACO phenotype.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10713320PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-23-1031DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

wheezing
20
aco non-aco
16
wheezing aco
16
non-aco groups
12
clinical characteristics
12
aco wheezing
12
non-aco wheezing
12
patients
11
aco
11
wheezing patients
8

Similar Publications

Early preschool wheeze trajectories are predominantly non-allergic with distinct biologic and microbiome traits.

J Allergy Clin Immunol

September 2025

Department of Pediatrics, and Translational Medicine, SickKids Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address:

Background: Disentangling preschool wheezing heterogeneity in terms of clinical traits, temporal patterns, and collective healthcare burden is critical for precise and effective interventions.

Objective: We aimed to collectively define contributions and distinct characteristics of respiratory phenotypes based on longitudinal wheeze and atopic sensitization patterns in the first 5 years of life.

Methods: Group-based trajectory analysis was performed in the CHILD Cohort study to identify distinct wheeze and allergic sensitization trajectories.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Although several fungal infections have been linked to asthma development, the relationship between histoplasmosis and asthma development has not been fully described.

Objectives: To assess the incidence of new asthma diagnosis codes or short-acting β agonist (SABA) prescription in the year following histoplasmosis diagnosis and identify potentially related factors.

Methods: We used a large health insurance claims database to identify patients with histoplasmosis with and without an asthma diagnosis code or a short-acting β agonist prescription in the year after diagnosis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Beyond respiratory syncytial virus and rhinovirus: The other viral respiratory bandits.

Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol

September 2025

Arkansas Children's Research Institute, Little Rock, Arkansas; Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas. Electronic address:

Asthma affects approximately 25 million people in the United States, with respiratory viruses playing a significant role in both the onset and exacerbations of the condition. Although rhinovirus and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) are the most well-known triggers, other iratory viruses playing a significant role in both the on, human parainfluenza virus, human bocavirus, enterovirus D68, influenza, and SARS-CoV-2 are increasingly recognized for their significant impact on asthma. These viruses contribute to both the development of asthma and exacerbations by inducing airway inflammation, disrupting epithelial barriers, and skewing immune responses-particularly toward type 2 inflammation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and human metapneumovirus (hMPV) are common viral etiologies of respiratory infections. Although co-infection with other respiratory pathogens is frequently observed, its clinical significance remains unclear.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 57,746 patients who underwent FILMARRAY®, a comprehensive multiplex polymerase chain reaction testing, between November 2020 and March 2023.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF