98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: The diagnostic process is a dynamic, team-based activity that is an important aspect of ward rounds in teaching hospitals. However, few studies have examined how academic ward teams operate in areas such as diagnosis in the handoff of overnight admissions during ward rounds. This study draws key lessons from team interactions in the handoff process during ward rounds.
Objective: To describe how ward teams operate in the handoff of patients admitted overnight during ward rounds, and to characterize the role of the bedside patient evaluation in this context.
Design: A qualitative ethnographic approach using field observations and documentary analysis.
Participants: Attending physicians, medical residents, and medical students on general medicine services in a single teaching hospital.
Approach: Thirty-five hours of observations were undertaken over a 4-month period. We purposively approached a diverse group of attendings who cover a range of clinical teaching experience, and obtained informed consent from all ward team members and observed patients. Thirty patient handoffs were observed across 5 ward teams with 45 team members. We conducted thematic analysis of researcher field notes and electronic health record documents using social cognitive theories to characterize the dynamic interactions occurring in the real clinical environment.
Key Results: Teams spent less time during ward rounds on verifying history and physical examination findings, performing bedside evaluations, and discussing differential diagnoses than other aspects (e.g., reviewing patient data in conference rooms) in the team handoff process of overnight admissions. Several team-based approaches to diagnosis and bedside patient evaluations were observed, including debriefing for learning and decision-making.
Conclusions: This study highlights potential strengths and missed opportunities for teaching, learning, and engaging directly with patients in the ward team handoff of patients admitted overnight. These findings may inform curriculum development, faculty training, and patient safety research.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11043283 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-023-08549-x | DOI Listing |
World J Surg
September 2025
Department of Surgery, The University of Adelaide, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, South Australia, Australia.
Background: Ward-round quality impacts patient outcomes, and poor conduct results in increased rates of preventable adverse events. Despite being a core component of patient outcomes, there is minimal literature informing best practice. The aviation industry has mitigated human error using a "Sterile Cockpit" to reduce interruptions and non-essential activities.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFRehabilitation (Stuttg)
September 2025
Zentrum für psychische Gesundheit, Arbeitsgruppe Rehabilitationswissenschaften, Universitätsklinik Würzburg.
Dual rehabilitation (dR) of patients with physical and mental illnesses comprises equal care and cooperation between two specialist departments. As part of the multi-method project that aimed to evaluate dR in different indications (DUAL), we explored the acceptance from the rehabilitants' perspective.We conducted 36 semi-structured interviews with rehabilitants of different indications (psycho-gastroenterology, -dermatology, -orthopedics, -diabetology, -cardiology, -pneumology).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFESC Heart Fail
September 2025
Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Aims: Despite therapeutic advancements, the prognosis of heart failure (HF) remains poor, with high rates of mortality and readmission, particularly following a HF exacerbation. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of a nurse-coordinated multidisciplinary comprehensive HF management programme on HF patients.
Methods And Results: This retrospective cohort study involved patients admitted for acute HF exacerbation at a regional hospital in Hong Kong.
BJPsych Bull
September 2025
Resident Doctor, Mersey and West Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Prescot, UK.
Aims And Method: This scoping review examines the literature on psychiatric in-patient ward rounds, a crucial and ubiquitous but understudied component of psychiatric care. We sought to examine the methods and perspectives used in research on ward rounds and identify recommendations for practice.
Results: The review identified 26 studies from diverse in-patient settings but predominantly UK-based, which made 21 recommendations for practice.
J Surg Educ
September 2025
University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Objective: This study explored learning barriers and facilitators medical students encountered during a general surgical rotation in various surgical environments, to create a framework to enhance learning in these environments.
Design: This was a cross-sectional qualitative study using an open-ended questionnaire with separate versions for students and teachers. An inductive thematic analysis was conducted, followed by a theory-informed deductive analysis.