98%
921
2 minutes
20
Introduction: The ability to process verbal language seems unique to humans and relies not only on semantics but on other forms of communication such as affective vocalizations, that we share with other primate species-particularly great apes ().
Methods: To better understand these processes at the behavioral and brain level, we asked human participants to categorize vocalizations of four primate species including human, great apes (chimpanzee and bonobo), and monkey (rhesus macaque) during MRI acquisition.
Results: Classification was above chance level for all species but bonobo vocalizations. Imaging analyses were computed using a participant-specific, trial-by-trial fitted probability categorization value in a model-based style of data analysis. Model-based analyses revealed the implication of the bilateral orbitofrontal cortex and inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) respectively correlating and anti-correlating with the fitted probability of accurate species classification. Further conjunction analyses revealed enhanced activity in a sub-area of the left IFG specifically for the accurate classification of chimpanzee calls compared to human voices.
Discussion: Our data-that are controlled for acoustic variability between species-therefore reveal distinct frontal mechanisms that shed light on how the human brain evolved to process vocal signals.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10661312 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/texcom/tgad019 | DOI Listing |
Cureus
August 2025
Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, JPN.
Cerebral infarction is a rare but serious complication after pulmonary resection for lung cancer. A 78-year-old man with hypertension and diabetes underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic right middle lobectomy for stage IA2 adenocarcinoma. On postoperative day 1, he developed acute right hemiparesis and motor aphasia.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBrain Behav
September 2025
Centre For Cognitive and Clinical Neuroscience, College of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Brunel University of London, London, UK.
Introduction: There is an ongoing debate about the neural mechanisms and subjective preferences involved in the processing of social rewards compared to non-social reward types.
Methods: Using whole-brain functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we examined brain activation patterns during the anticipation and consumption phases of monetary and social rewards (using the Monetary and Social Incentive Delay Task-MSIDT, featuring human avatars) and their associations with self-reported social reward preferences measured by the Social Reward Questionnaire (SRQ) in 20 healthy right-handed individuals.
Results: In the anticipation phase, all reward types activated the dorsal striatum, middle cingulo-insular (salience) network, inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), and supplementary motor areas.
Ann Biomed Eng
September 2025
Department of Training and Movement Sciences, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Philippstr. 13, Haus 11, 10115, Berlin, Germany.
The functional interaction of regulatory mechanisms that manage total centre of mass (CoM) energy, frontal plane whole-body angular momentum and mediolateral margin of stability (MoS) during hole negotiation gait was investigated. Joint kinematics, leg posture, total CoM energy, frontal plane whole-body angular momentum, mediolateral MoS and muscle activation patterns of seven bilateral lower leg muscles were assessed in 18 participants. During hole negotiation, we found an increase in the peak-to-peak range of total CoM energy and frontal plane whole-body angular momentum during the preparation, hole and recovery steps, and a decrease in mediolateral MoS at touch-down during the preparation and hole steps compared to level walking, providing evidence of an increased challenge in stability control.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBrain
September 2025
Center for Brain Plasticity and Recovery, Center for Aphasia Research and Rehabilitation, Departments of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, 20057 USA.
The role of the right hemisphere in aphasia recovery has been controversial since the 19th century. Imaging studies have sometimes found increased activation in right hemisphere regions homotopic to canonical left hemisphere language regions, but these results have been questioned due to small sample sizes, unreliable imaging tasks, and task performance confounds that affect right hemisphere activation levels even in neurologically healthy adults. Several principles of right hemisphere language recruitment in aphasia have been proposed based on these studies: that the right hemisphere is recruited primarily by individuals with severe left hemisphere damage, that transcallosal disinhibition results in recruitment of right hemisphere regions homotopic to the lesion, and that increased right hemisphere activation diminishes to baseline levels over time.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFront Neurosci
August 2025
School of Psychology, Hainan Normal University, Haikou, China.
Introduction: This study utilized electroencephalography (EEG) to compare brain functional and effective connectivity patterns in children with reading difficulties (RD) and math difficulties (MD) during specific tasks. The aim was to identify neurophysiological distinctions between these two learning disorders, which often exhibit high comorbidity.
Methods: Data from a publicly available dataset of 28 children (11 RD, 17 MD) aged 7-13 years were analyzed.