Dosimetric analysis of brachial plexopathy after stereotactic body radiotherapy: Significance of organ delineation.

Radiother Oncol

Department of Radiation Oncology, CyberKnife Center, and Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China. Electronic address: zyuan@tmu

Published: January 2024


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Objectives: Examine the significance of contouring the brachial plexus (BP) for toxicity estimation and select metrics for predicting radiation-induced brachial plexopathy (RIBP) after stereotactic body radiotherapy.

Materials And Methods: Patients with planning target volume (PTV) ≤ 2 cm from the BP were eligible. The BP was contoured primarily according to the RTOG 1106 atlas, while subclavian-axillary veins (SAV) were contoured according to RTOG 0236. Apical PTVs were classified as anterior (PTV-A) or posterior (PTV-B) PTVs. Variables predicting grade 2 or higher RIBP (RIBP2) were selected through least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression and logistic regression.

Results: Among 137 patients with 140 BPs (median follow-up, 32.1 months), 11 experienced RIBP2. For patients with RIBP2, the maximum physical dose to the BP (BP-D) was 46.5 Gy (median; range, 35.7 to 60.7 Gy). Of these patients, 54.5 % (6/11) satisfied the RTOG limits when using SAV delineation; among them, 83.3 % (5/6) had PTV-B. For patients with PTV-B, the maximum physical dose to SAV (SAV-D) was 11.2 Gy (median) lower than BP-D. Maximum and 0.3 cc biologically effective doses to the BP based on the linear-quadratic-linear model (BP-BED and BP-BED, α/β = 3) were selected as predictive variables with thresholds of 118 and 73 Gy, respectively.

Conclusion: Contouring SAV may significantly underestimate the RIBP2 risk in dosimetry, especially for patients with PTV-B. BP contouring indicated BP-BED and BP-BED as potential predictors of RIBP2.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2023.110023DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

brachial plexopathy
8
stereotactic body
8
contoured rtog
8
maximum physical
8
physical dose
8
patients ptv-b
8
bp-bed bp-bed
8
patients
6
ribp2
5
dosimetric analysis
4

Similar Publications

Case: A 15-year-old adolescent boy sustained complete right brachial plexus paralysis after a motorcycle crash in 1998. Two months later, he underwent double free muscle transfer (DFMT) at our institution. Over 26 years, he retained practical hand function and returned to full-time work as a piping installer.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Patient navigators attend visits with health care teams for the administrative aspects of patients' health-related social needs. We describe an innovative patient navigator intervention in an orthopedic clinic focused on brachial plexus birth injury, a diagnosis that disproportionately affects medically underserved and underresourced children, and present policy implications of this intervention.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Nerve transfers are a cornerstone in the surgical management of traumatic brachial plexus injuries (BPIs) to restore elbow flexion. Common donor nerves include intraplexal sources like the ulnar and median nerves (fascicular transfers) and extraplexal sources like the intercostal nerves (ICNs). Despite the widespread use of both techniques, the optimal donor nerve remains a subject of debate.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF