98%
921
2 minutes
20
Objectives: Colonoscopy withdrawal times are associated with the adenoma detection rate (ADR). However, the relationship between ADR and cecal insertion time has been inadequately characterized. We aimed to evaluate endoscopist-related factors involved in the ADR, including the average individual colonoscopy insertion and withdrawal times.
Methods: This observational study used a colonoscopy database with pathology data from routine clinical practice in Japanese institutions. The odds ratios (OR) of endoscopist-related factors related to ADRs were examined using a generalized linear mixed model.
Results: Of the 186,293 colonoscopies performed during the study period, 47,705 colonoscopies by 189 endoscopists in four hospitals were analyzed for ADR. The overall ADR was 38.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 37.8, 38.7). Compared to endoscopists with mean cecal insertion times of <5 min, the OR of ADR for those with mean cecal insertion times of 5-9, 10-14, and ≥15 min were 0.84 (95% CI 0.71, 0.99), 0.68 (95% CI 0.52, 0.90), and 0.45 (95% CI 0.25, 0.78), respectively. Compared to endoscopists with mean withdrawal times of <6 min, the OR of ADR for those with mean withdrawal times of 6-9, 10-14, and ≥15 min were 1.38 (95% CI 1.03, 1.85), 1.48 (95% CI 1.09, 2.02), and 1.68 (95% CI 1.04, 2.61), respectively. There were no significant differences in ADRs by endoscopist specialty, gender, or the total number of examinations performed.
Conclusion: Individual mean colonoscopy insertion time was associated with ADR and might be considered as a colonoscopy quality indicator as well as withdrawal time.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/den.14721 | DOI Listing |
Endosc Int Open
May 2025
Department of Gastroenterology, Spaarne Gasthuis, Hoofddorp, Netherlands.
Background And Study Aims: Colonoscopy is considered to be the gold standard for detecting colorectal cancer. However, this technique is not flawless and post-colonoscopy colorectal cancers (PCCRCs) can occur. Therefore, we investigated the association between patient- and endoscopist-related risk factors and occurrence of PCCRC.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIGIE
September 2024
Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.
Background: Pancreatitis following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) can lead to significant morbidity and mortality. We aimed to develop an accurate post-ERCP pancreatitis risk prediction model using easily obtainable variables.
Methods: Using prospective multi-center ERCP data, we performed logistic regression using stepwise selection on several patient-, procedure-, and endoscopist-related factors that were determined a priori.
Dig Endosc
January 2024
Department of Gastroenterology, Kyoto Second Red Cross Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Endosc Int Open
September 2023
Gastroenterology, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Upper gastrointestinal (UGI) endoscopy lacks established quality indicators. We conducted an umbrella systematic review of potential quality indicators for the detection of UGI cancer and dysplasia. Bibliographic databases were searched up to December 2021 for systematic reviews and primary studies.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF