Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Objectives: Colonoscopy withdrawal times are associated with the adenoma detection rate (ADR). However, the relationship between ADR and cecal insertion time has been inadequately characterized. We aimed to evaluate endoscopist-related factors involved in the ADR, including the average individual colonoscopy insertion and withdrawal times.

Methods: This observational study used a colonoscopy database with pathology data from routine clinical practice in Japanese institutions. The odds ratios (OR) of endoscopist-related factors related to ADRs were examined using a generalized linear mixed model.

Results: Of the 186,293 colonoscopies performed during the study period, 47,705 colonoscopies by 189 endoscopists in four hospitals were analyzed for ADR. The overall ADR was 38.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 37.8, 38.7). Compared to endoscopists with mean cecal insertion times of <5 min, the OR of ADR for those with mean cecal insertion times of 5-9, 10-14, and ≥15 min were 0.84 (95% CI 0.71, 0.99), 0.68 (95% CI 0.52, 0.90), and 0.45 (95% CI 0.25, 0.78), respectively. Compared to endoscopists with mean withdrawal times of <6 min, the OR of ADR for those with mean withdrawal times of 6-9, 10-14, and ≥15 min were 1.38 (95% CI 1.03, 1.85), 1.48 (95% CI 1.09, 2.02), and 1.68 (95% CI 1.04, 2.61), respectively. There were no significant differences in ADRs by endoscopist specialty, gender, or the total number of examinations performed.

Conclusion: Individual mean colonoscopy insertion time was associated with ADR and might be considered as a colonoscopy quality indicator as well as withdrawal time.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/den.14721DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

endoscopist-related factors
12
adenoma detection
8
cecal insertion
8
adr
5
factors adenoma
4
colonoscopy
4
detection colonoscopy
4
colonoscopy data
4
data j-scout
4
j-scout study
4

Similar Publications

Background And Study Aims: Colonoscopy is considered to be the gold standard for detecting colorectal cancer. However, this technique is not flawless and post-colonoscopy colorectal cancers (PCCRCs) can occur. Therefore, we investigated the association between patient- and endoscopist-related risk factors and occurrence of PCCRC.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study analyzed data from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry to identify factors affecting colonoscopy cecal intubation rates, focusing on patient demographics and endoscopist characteristics.
  • Results indicated that women, older patients, and those with certain BMI categories (either low or high) were less likely to have complete colonoscopies, with men having a higher completion rate.
  • Endoscopist factors such as specialization in gastroenterology and higher adenoma detection rates were associated with increased likelihoods of completion, particularly impacting thin women.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Pancreatitis following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) can lead to significant morbidity and mortality. We aimed to develop an accurate post-ERCP pancreatitis risk prediction model using easily obtainable variables.

Methods: Using prospective multi-center ERCP data, we performed logistic regression using stepwise selection on several patient-, procedure-, and endoscopist-related factors that were determined a priori.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study investigates how colonoscopy insertion and withdrawal times affect the adenoma detection rate (ADR), which is important for cancer screening effectiveness.
  • Using data from a large sample of colonoscopies performed by various endoscopists in Japan, researchers found that longer cecal insertion times were linked to lower ADRs, while longer withdrawal times were associated with higher ADRs.
  • The findings suggest that both insertion and withdrawal times should be considered as quality indicators for colonoscopy procedures.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Upper gastrointestinal (UGI) endoscopy lacks established quality indicators. We conducted an umbrella systematic review of potential quality indicators for the detection of UGI cancer and dysplasia. Bibliographic databases were searched up to December 2021 for systematic reviews and primary studies.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF