Variation of CI-2 Conformers upon Addition of Methanol to Water: An IMS-MS-Based Thermodynamic Analysis.

Chymotrypsin inhibitor 2 (CI-2) is a well-studied, textbook example of a cooperative, two-state, native ↔ denatured folding transition. A recent hybrid ion mobility spectrometry (IMS)/mass spectrometry (MS) thermal denaturation study of CI-2 (the well-studied truncated 64-residue model) in water reported evidence that this two-state transition involves numerous (∼41) unique native and non-native (denatured) solution conformations. The characterization of so many, often low-abundance, states is possible because of the very high dynamic range of IMS-MS measurements of ionic species that are produced upon electrospraying CI-2 solutions from a variable temperature electrospray ionization source. A thermodynamic analysis of these states revealed large changes in enthalpy (Δ) and entropy (Δ) at different temperatures, and it was suggested that such variation might arise because of temperature-dependent conformational changes of the protein in response to changes in the conformational entropy and the dielectric permeability of water, which drops from a value of ε ∼ 79 at 24 °C to ∼ 60 at 82 °C. Herein, we examine how adding methanol to water influences the distributions of CI-2 conformers and their ensuing stabilities. The dielectric constant of a 60:40 water:methanol (MeOH) drops from ε ∼ 60 at 24 °C to ∼ 51 at 64 °C. Although the same set of conformers observed in water appears to be present in 60:40 water:MeOH, the abundance of each is substantially altered by the presence of methanol. Relative free energy values (Δ) and thermodynamic values [Δ and Δ and heat capacities (Δ)] are derived from a Gibbs-Helmholtz analysis. A comparison of these data from water and water:MeOH systems allows rare insight into how variations in solvation and temperature affect many-state protein equilibria. While these studies confirm that variations in solvent dielectric constant with temperature affect the distributions of conformers that are observed, our findings suggest that other solvent differences may also affect abundances.