98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: Numerous randomised clinical trials and real-world studies have supported the safety of paclitaxel-coated devices for the treatment of femoropopliteal occlusive disease. However, a 2018 summary-level meta-analysis suggested an increased mortality risk for paclitaxel-coated devices compared with uncoated control devices. This study presents an updated analysis of deaths using the most complete and current data available from pivotal trials of paclitaxel-coated versus control devices.
Methods: Ten trials comparing paclitaxel-coated versus control devices were included in a patient-level pooled analysis. Cox regression models were used to evaluate the effect of paclitaxel exposure on risk of death in both intention-to-treat (ITT; primary analysis) and three as-treated analysis sets accounting for treatment group crossover at the index procedure and over time. The effect of paclitaxel dose and baseline covariates were also evaluated.
Findings: A total of 2666 participants were included with a median follow-up of 4·9 years. No significant increase in deaths was observed for patients treated with paclitaxel-coated devices. This was true in the ITT analysis (hazard ratio [HR] 1·14, 95% CI 0·93-1·40), the as-treated analysis (HR 1·13, 95% CI 0·92-1·39), and in two crossover analyses: 1·07 (0·87-1·31) when late crossovers were censored and 1·04 (0·84-1·28) when crossovers were analysed from the date of paclitaxel exposure. There was no significant effect of paclitaxel dose on mortality risk.
Interpretation: This meta-analysis found no association between paclitaxel-coated device exposure and risk of death, providing reassurance to patients, physicians, and regulators on the safety of paclitaxel-coated devices.
Funding: Becton Dickinson, Boston Scientific, Cook, Medtronic, Philips, Surmodics, and TriReme Medical.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02189-X | DOI Listing |
Lancet
August 2025
Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Background: Drug-coated devices are frequently used in coronary and peripheral interventions, but their effect on amputation risk in peripheral artery disease is unclear. We assessed whether drug-coated devices affect the rate of above-ankle amputation in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischaemia undergoing infrainguinal endovascular revascularisation.
Methods: The Swedish Drug-Elution Trial in Peripheral Arterial Disease 1 (SWEDEPAD 1) was a pragmatic, nationwide, multicentre, participant-masked, registry-based, randomised controlled trial at 22 Swedish centres.
Lancet
August 2025
Department of Radiology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Radiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Background: Drug-coated devices are widely used to reduce restenosis after lower limb revascularisation in patients with peripheral artery disease, but their effect on patient-centred outcomes remains unclear. We assessed the effect of paclitaxel-coated devices on clinically important outcomes in patients with intermittent claudication undergoing infrainguinal endovascular revascularisation.
Methods: The Swedish Drug-Elution Trial in Peripheral Arterial Disease 2 (SWEDEPAD 2) was a pragmatic, nationwide, multicentre, participant-masked, registry-based, randomised controlled trial conducted at 22 Swedish vascular centres.
Medicina (Kaunas)
August 2025
Emergency Clinical Hospital Dr. Bagdasar-Arseni, 041915 Bucharest, Romania.
Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) have transformed percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) by delivering antiproliferative drugs directly to the arterial wall, offering a stent-less approach that mitigates the risks associated with permanent metallic implants. Initially developed for in-stent restenosis (ISR), DCBs have demonstrated robust efficacy in reducing neointimal hyperplasia and target lesion revascularization (TLR) rates across diverse coronary lesions, including small vessel disease (SVD), de novo lesions, and complex anatomies such as bifurcation lesions. Paclitaxel-coated balloons have long been the cornerstone of DCB therapy due to their established clinical outcomes, but sirolimus-coated balloons are emerging as a promising alternative with potentially superior safety profiles and sustained drug release.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Am Coll Cardiol
August 2025
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Background: Patients with coronary in-stent restenosis (ISR) within multiple layers of stent pose a specific clinical challenge because of higher rates of recurrent restenosis as well as a desire to avoid an additional layer of stent. Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) provide an alternative antiproliferative therapeutic option for multilayer ISR.
Objectives: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of a low-dose paclitaxel-coated vs uncoated balloon among patients with multilayer or single-layer ISR in the AGENT IDE (A Clinical Trial to Assess the Agent Paclitaxel Coated PTCA Balloon Catheter for the Treatment of Subjects With In-Stent Restenosis) trial.
J Endovasc Ther
July 2025
Department of Vascular Surgery, AZ Sint-Blasius, Dendermonde, Belgium.
Background: There is evidence that the treatment of symptomatic femoropopliteal disease with a drug-coated balloon (DCB) effectively inhibits restenosis. However for longer and more complex lesions, "bailout" remains stenting almost inevitable. Although the combination therapy of DCBs and modern bare metal stent (BMS) has not been widely studied, there are indications that this combination therapy is doing better than BMS alone and could be a potential alternative for drug-eluting stent treatment.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF