Up-to-Date Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening Test Use in the United States, 2021.

Prev Chronic Dis

Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.

Published: October 2023


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Introduction: We examined national estimates of breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer (CRC) screening test use and compared them with Healthy People 2030 national targets. Test use in 2021 was compared with prepandemic estimates.

Methods: In 2022, we used 2021 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) data to estimate proportions of adults up to date with US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations for breast (women aged 50-74 y), cervical (women aged 21-65 y), and CRC screening (adults aged 50-75 y) across sociodemographic and health care access variables. We compared age-standardized estimates from the 2021 and 2019 NHIS.

Results: Percentages of adults up to date in 2021 were 75.7% (95% CI, 74.4%-76.9%), 75.2% (95% CI, 73.9%-76.4%), and 72.2% (95% CI, 71.2%-73.2%) for breast, cervical, and CRC screening, respectively. Estimates were below 50% among those without a wellness check in 3 years (all screening types), among those without a usual source of care or insurance (aged <65 y) (breast and CRC screening), and among those residing in the US for less than 10 years (CRC screening). Percentages of adults who were up to date with breast and cervical cancer screening and colonoscopy were similar in 2019 and 2021. Fecal occult blood/fecal immunochemical test (FOBT/FIT) use was modestly higher in 2021 (P < .001).

Conclusions: In 2021, approximately 1 in 4 adults of screening age were not up to date with breast, cervical, and CRC screening recommendations, and Healthy People 2030 national targets were not met. Disparities existed across several characteristics, particularly those related to health care access. Breast, cervical, and colonoscopy test use within recommended screening intervals approximated prepandemic levels. FOBT/FIT estimates were modestly higher in 2021.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10625435PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd20.230071DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

breast cervical
12
crc screening
12
cervical colorectal
8
colorectal cancer
8
screening test
8
women aged
8
screening
5
0
5
up-to-date breast
4
cervical
4

Similar Publications

Neural activity is increasingly recognized as a crucial regulator of cancer growth. In the brain, neuronal activity robustly influences glioma growth through paracrine mechanisms and by electrochemical integration of malignant cells into neural circuitry via neuron-to-glioma synapses. Outside of the central nervous system, innervation of tumours such as prostate, head and neck, breast, pancreatic, and gastrointestinal cancers by peripheral nerves similarly regulates cancer progression.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Design, synthesis and antitumor activity of pentacyclic triterpenoid Asiatic acid derivatives as Sp1 inhibitors.

Bioorg Med Chem Lett

September 2025

Department of Chemical Engineering, Analysis and Test Center, Shenyang University of Chemical Technology, Shenyang 110142, China. Electronic address:

Asiatic acid (AA) was used as the lead compound and 22 inhibitors of specificity protein 1 (Sp1) were designed and synthesized with modification at A ring and C-28 position of AA, whose structures were confirmed by HRMS, H NMR and C NMR. The growth inhibitory effects of Asiatic acid derivatives on human breast cancer cells (MCF-7) and cervical cancer cells (Hela) were determined by tetramethyl azole salt (3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide, MTT) colorimetric assay. The results showed that all of these compounds inhibited the proliferation of HeLa and MCF-7 cells, and all the derivatives showed stronger tumor cytotoxicity than AA, among which compounds I, II, and III were comparable to the positive control drug cisplatin.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: Treatment delay can adversely affect cancer prognosis and public health. However, previous studies have not examined the association between cancer treatment delay and 5-year mortality risk for various cancer types in a single study population.

Methods: We used retrospective cohort data from 21 740 patients diagnosed with common cancers between 2000 and 2017, with mortality follow-up to 2022, from the Philippines' Department of Health-Rizal Cancer Registry to understand how treatment delay of <30, 30-90, or >90 days was associated with 5-year all-cause mortality risk, by cancer type and stage at diagnosis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) expands treatment options for solid tumor patients and identifies hereditary cancers. However, in Japan, confirmatory tests have been conducted in only 31.6% of patients with presumed germline pathogenic variants (GPVs) detected through tumor-only testing.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF