Comparing Robotic-Assisted to Open Radical Cystectomy in the Management of Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Propensity Score Matched-Pair Analysis.

Background: For non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) requiring radical surgery, limited data are available comparing robotic-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion (iRARC) to open radical cystectomy (ORC). The objective of this study was to compare the two surgical techniques.

Methods: A multicentric cohort of 593 patients with NMIBC undergoing iRARC or ORC between 2015 and 2020 was prospectively gathered. Perioperative and pathologic outcomes were compared.

Results: A total of 143 patients operated on via iRARC were matched to 143 ORC patients. Operative time was longer in the iRARC group ( = 0.034). Blood loss was higher in the ORC group ( < 0.001), with a consequent increased post-operative transfusion rate in the ORC group ( = 0.003). Length of stay was longer in the ORC group ( = 0.007). Post-operative complications did not differ significantly (all > 0.05). DFS at 60 months was 55.9% in ORC and 75.2% in iRARC with a statistically significant difference ( = 0.033) found in the univariate analysis.

Conclusion: We found that iRARC for patients with NMIBC is safe, associated with a lower blood loss, a lower transfusion rate and a shorter hospital stay compared to ORC. Complication rates were similar. No significant differences in survival analyses emerged across the two techniques.