Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Aim: Rectal cancers requiring beyond total mesorectal excision (bTME) are traditionally operated using an open approach, but the use of minimally invasive robot-assisted procedures is increasing. Introduction of minimal invasive surgery for complex cancer cases could be associated with compromised surgical margins or increased complication rates. Therefore, reporting results both clinical and oncological in large series is important. Since bTME procedure reports are heterogeneous, comparing results is often difficult. In this study, a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) classification system was used to describe the bTME surgery according to pelvic compartments.

Methods: Consecutive patients with primary rectal cancer operated with laparoscopic robot-assisted bTME were prospectively included for 2 years. All patients had tumors that threatened the mesorectal fascia, invaded adjacent organs, and/or involved metastatic pelvic lateral lymph nodes. Short-term clinical outcomes and oncological specimen quality were registered. Surgery was classified according to pelvic compartments resected.

Results: Clear resection margins (R0 resection) were achieved in 95 out of 105 patients (90.5%). About 26% had Accordion Severity Grading System of Surgical Complications grade 3-4 complications and 15% required re-operations. About 7% were converted to open surgery. The number of compartments resected ranged from one to the maximum seven, with 83% having two or three compartments resected. All 10 R1 resections occurred in the lateral and posterior compartments.

Conclusions: The short-term clinical outcomes and oncological specimen quality after robot-assisted bTME surgery were comparable to previously published open bTME surgery. The description of surgical procedures using the Royal Marsden MRI compartment classification was feasible.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/14574969231200654DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

btme surgery
12
primary rectal
8
rectal cancers
8
cancers requiring
8
requiring total
8
total mesorectal
8
mesorectal excision
8
robot-assisted btme
8
short-term clinical
8
clinical outcomes
8

Similar Publications

Robotic surgery is increasingly utilized for rectal cancer resection, particularly in cases requiring beyond total mesorectal excision (bTME) to achieve oncological clearance. Despite longer operative times, robotic bTME has been associated with reduced morbidity and blood loss, making it an emerging approach in specialized centers. A systematic review following PRISMA guidelines was conducted in Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Tailored resection for persistent extramural vascular invasion in locally advanced rectal cancers.

Colorectal Dis

November 2024

Division of Colo-Rectal and Peritoneal Surface Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.

Background: Extramural vascular invasion (EMVI) is a bad prognostic feature in rectal cancer and cancers that remain EMVI positive after neoadjuvant therapy are at high risk for having involved circumferential resection margins. Conventional total mesorectal excision (TME) resections are inadequate in such cases and often lead to positive margins.

Methods: We propose a technique for the surgical management of locally advanced tumours with persistent EMVI after neoadjuvant therapy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The aim of this study was to compare relative survival in non-metastatic rectal cancer clinically staged as T3-T4 requiring beyond total mesorectal excision (TME) to that after standard TME.

Methods: This population-based study included all patients operated with anterior resection, abdominoperineal excision or Hartmann's procedure for non-metastatic rectal cancer clinically staged as T3-T4 in Sweden between 2009 and 2018. Relative survival was analysed in relation to surgery beyond TME (bTME), which was subcategorized as bTME- and bTME + to account for extent of resection.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • * The study was conducted in four phases: reviewing literature, evaluating retrospective outcomes, analyzing ERAS compliance, and forming a tailored ERAS protocol through team discussions.
  • * Results indicated that bTME patients had longer hospital stays and higher complication rates compared to typical colorectal ERAS patients, highlighting the need for a customized ERAS approach for better outcomes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • A study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision (bTME) for locally advanced rectal tumors, involving a multicenter analysis of 168 patients from July 2015 to November 2020.
  • Most patients were around 60 years old, with a significant portion undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy; the procedure had a low conversion rate to laparotomy and a notable instance of postoperative complications.
  • Results showed an R0 resection rate of 92.9%, with overall survival rates of 91.7%, 82.1%, and 76.8% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively, suggesting that robotic bTME
View Article and Find Full Text PDF