98%
921
2 minutes
20
Objectives: The use of electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) systems to support the management of patients with chronic kidney disease is increasing. This mixed-methods study aimed to comprehensively identify existing and developing ePRO systems, used in nephrology settings globally, ascertaining key characteristics and factors for successful implementation.
Study Design: ePRO systems and developers were identified through a scoping review of the literature and contact with field experts. Developers were invited to participate in a structured survey, to summarise key system characteristics including: (1) system objectives, (2) population, (3) PRO measures used, (4) level of automation, (5) reporting, (6) integration into workflow and (7) links to electronic health records/national registries. Subsequent semistructured interviews were conducted to explore responses.
Setting And Participants: Eligible systems included those being developed or used in nephrology settings to assess ePROs and summarise results to care providers. System developers included those with a key responsibility for aspects of the design, development or implementation of an eligible system.
Analytical Approach: Structured survey data were summarised using descriptive statistics. Interview transcripts were analysed using Codebook Thematic Analysis using domains from the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.
Results: Fifteen unique ePRO systems were identified across seven countries; 10 system developers completed the structured survey and 7 participated in semistructured interviews. Despite system heterogeneity, reported features required for effective implementation included early and sustained patient involvement, clinician champions and expanding existing electronic platforms to integrate ePROs. Systems demonstrated several common features, with the majority being implemented within research settings, thereby affecting system implementation readiness for real-world application.
Conclusions: There has been considerable research investment in ePRO systems. The findings of this study outline key system features and factors to support the successful implementation of ePROs in routine kidney care.Cite Now.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10347510 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070927 | DOI Listing |
Front Digit Health
August 2025
School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Background: Cancer care increasingly emphasizes patient-centred approaches, leading to the adoption of electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) systems for essential patient data collection. Our systematic review investigates the landscape of electronic patient-reported outcome systems and their capability in cancer care, focusing on their potential to enhance patient-centred solutions.
Methods: We conducted a systematic review, encompassing studies on electronic patient-reported outcomes in cancer.
Ther Innov Regul Sci
August 2025
FMC Medical Center, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand.
Lord-Bessen et al. demonstrated that both single-item-per-screen and multiple-items-per-screen ePRO formats are acceptable, with minimal differences in usability and completion time. While format preference may be individual-specific, broader considerations-including patient cognitive load, device type, language complexity, and trial phase-are crucial for context-aware ePRO design.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFClin Lung Cancer
August 2025
Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC. Electronic address:
Introduction: Remote symptom monitoring using electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) during cancer care provides clinical benefits. We assessed the feasibility, acceptability, and utility of a web application (Moovcare®) for lung cancer care.
Materials And Methods: In this single-site study (NCT05011890), patients with lung cancer (n = 41) were enrolled to 6 months of weekly symptom reporting using Moovcare®.
JMIR Cancer
August 2025
Helsinki University Hospital Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Helsinki, Haartmaninkatu 4, building 2, P.O. Box 180, Helsinki, 00029 HUS, Finland, 358 94711.
Background: An increasing number of early-stage breast cancer (EBC) survivors and limited health care resources have raised interest in developing digital methods for communication between patients and health care personnel. In 2015, Helsinki University Hospital (HUS) Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC) launched a digital solution called Noona (Helsinki University Hospital; Noona Healthcare) for patients with cancer, which allows patients to report their symptoms or side effects and ask questions with a computer or smart mobile device.
Objective: In this study, we compare the cost and contacts of surveillance of EBC by 2 follow-up methods: digital solution and phone calls during their first year of follow-up outside preplanned visits.
JMIR Cancer
August 2025
Institute of Applied Biosciences, Centre for Research and Technology-Hellas, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Background: Palliative care is crucial for patients with life-threatening and serious diseases such as cancer, as it addresses their physical, psychosocial, and spiritual needs. Hematological malignancies significantly contribute to global cancer cases, impacting both older adults and children. To meet the increasing demand for palliative care, electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) interventions offer valuable insights into patient monitoring and treatment decision-making.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF