Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Purpose: Photosealing of many biological tissues can be achieved using a biocompatible material in combination with a dye that is activated by visible light to chemically bond over the tissue defect via protein cross-linking reactions. The aim of this study was to test the efficacy of photosealing using a commercially available biomembrane (AmnioExcel Plus) to securely close dural defects in comparison to another sutureless method (fibrin glue) in terms of repair strength.
Methods: Two-millimeter diameter holes were created in dura harvested from New Zealand white rabbits and repaired ex vivo using one of two methods: (1) in n = 10 samples, photosealing was used to bond a 6-mm-diameter AmnioExcel Plus patch over the dural defect, and (2) in n = 10 samples, fibrin glue was used to attach the same patch over the dural defect. Repaired dura samples were then subjected to burst pressure testing. Histological analysis was also performed of photosealed dura.
Results: The mean burst pressures of rabbit dura repaired with photosealing and fibrin glue were 302 ± 149 mmHg and 26 ± 24 mmHg, respectively. The increased repair strength using photosealing was statistically significant and considerably higher than the normal intracranial pressure of ~ 20 mmHg. Histology demonstrated a tight union at the interface between the dura surface and patch with no disruption of the dura structure.
Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that photosealing performs better than fibrin glue for the fixation of a patch for ex vivo repair of small dural defects. Photosealing is worthy of testing in pre-clinical models for the repair of dural defects.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-023-05653-z | DOI Listing |