Comparison of the Results of Prenatal and Postnatal Echocardiography and Postnatal Cardiac MRI in Children with a Congenital Heart Defect.

Objective: In fetuses with suspicion of congenital heart disease (CHD), assessment by segmental fetal echocardiography is of great importance. This study sought to examine the concordance of expert fetal echocardiography and postnatal MRI of the heart at a high-volume paediatric heart centre.

Methods: The data of two hundred forty-two fetuses have been gathered under the condition of full pre- and postnatal and the presence of a pre- and postnatal diagnosis of CHD. The haemodynamically leading diagnosis was determined for each test person and was then sorted into diagnostic groups. The diagnoses and diagnostic groups were used for the comparison of diagnostic accuracy in fetal echocardiography.

Results: All comparisons between the diagnostic methods for detection of congenital heart disease showed an "almost perfect" (Cohen's Kappa > 0.9) strength of agreement for the diagnostic groups. The diagnosis made by prenatal echocardiography showed a sensitivity of 90-100%, a specificity and a negative predictive value of 97-100%, and a positive predictive value of 85-100%. The diagnostic congruence resulted in an "almost perfect" strength of agreement for all evaluated diagnoses (transposition of great arteries, double outlet right ventricle, hypoplastic left heart, tetralogy of Fallot, atrioventricular septal defect). An agreement of Cohen's Kappa > 0.9 was achieved for all groups, with exception of the diagnosis of double outlet right ventricle (0.8) in prenatal echocardiography compared to postnatal echocardiography. This study came to the result of a sensitivity of 88-100%, a specificity and negative predictive value of 97-100%, and a positive predictive value of 84-100%. The performance of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as an additional measure to echocardiography had an added value in the description of the malposition of the great arteries when diagnosed with double outlet right ventricle and in the detailed description of the anatomy of the lung circulation.

Conclusions: Prenatal echocardiography could be shown to be a reliable method for detection of congenital heart disease when regarding the slightly lower accuracy of diagnosis for double outlet right ventricle and right heart anomalies. Furthermore, the impact of examiner experience and the consideration of follow-up examinations for further improvement of diagnosis accuracy may not be underestimated. The main advantage of an additional MRI is the possibility to obtain a detailed anatomic description of the blood vessels of the lung and the outflow tract. The conduction of further studies that include false-negative and false-positive cases, and studies that are not set within the high-risk-group, as well as studies in a less specialized setting, would allow the completion and investigation of possible differences and discrepancies when comparing the results that have been obtained in this study.