98%
921
2 minutes
20
Purpose: Cement augmentation is considered to improve the bone-implant construct stability in hip fragility fractures, additionally biomechanical studies show that cement augmentation improves the pull-out strength and increases resistance to failure. Thus far, the advantage of these technique used in a clinical scenario is yet to be determined METHODS: a randomized, multicenter, single-blinded clinical trial was conducted in patients aged 65 years or older who were admitted to two level I trauma centers with a fragility intertrochanteric hip fracture during September 2015 and December 2017. Patients were stratified into 2 groups: patients between 65 and 85 years and older than 85 years. A balanced block randomization was performed using blocks of 6 patients: 3 patients assigned to the control group (no augmentation) and 3 patients to the intervention group. Follow-up visits were done at 1, 3, 6 and 12 postoperative months documenting the tip-apex distance (TAD) as well as followed up after 5 to 7 years of surgical procedure documenting EQ5D, Parker Mobility Score and mortality rates at these different time points.
Results: A total of 90 patients were included but only 53 patients completed a one-year follow up. The mean immediate postoperative and one-year follow up TAD measurement from the whole cohort (20.99 mm vs 21.3 mm, respectively) showed no statistical significance (P = 0.18). For patients in the control group, the difference of TAD measurements from the immediate postoperative and one-year follow-up was -0.25 mm (P = 0.441). For patients included in the intervention group, the difference of TAD measurement from the immediate postoperative and 1-year follow up was -0.48 mm (P = 0.383). No statistical difference was found when stratified by age (p = 0.78). One patient from the control group had an implant failure after 1-month postoperative. Readmission after 30 days showed no statistical difference between both groups (7 vs. 7 patients, p = 0.754). Augmentation did not show a difference in most of the functional outcomes nor quality of life after 5 to 7 years of surgical procedure.
Conclusions: The use of augmentation can be considered a safe procedure for the fixation of fragility hip fractures.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2023.05.007 | DOI Listing |
J Orthop Sci
September 2025
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NHO Saga Hospital, 1-20-1 Hinode, Saga 849-0923, Japan.
Background: Hounsfield units (HU) on computed tomography (CT) are strongly correlated with bone mineral density (BMD) and may aid in osteoporosis screening. However, there is no standardized method for assessing bone density in displaced femoral head fractures. This study aimed to measure HU values in the femoral head using preoperative post-fracture CT images of patients with intertrochanteric femoral fractures and investigate whether it correlated with BMD measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFClin Orthop Relat Res
August 2025
Complex Joint Reconstruction Center, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.
Background: Choosing the appropriate implants for reconstruction in revision TKA is essential for long-term fixation. While cones and augments are routinely utilized to address tibial defects, the effect of augment location and size on the biomechanical stability of revision TKA constructs and the indications for the use of metaphyseal cones are not known.
Questions/purposes: Is the risk of cement-implant debonding of revision TKA constructs impacted by the thickness and location (medial versus bicompartmental) of tibial augments and the presence of metaphyseal cones during (1) a demanding daily activity like stair ascent and (2) torsional loads?
Methods: Under institutional review board approval, we developed patient-specific finite-element models of revision TKA from four patients (three males and one female, ages 50 to 80 years, BMI 27 to 37 kg/m2) who underwent two-stage revision and had a CT scan with no metal artifact after first-stage implant removal.
Cureus
July 2025
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, JPN.
Objective: We aim to identify the characteristics and risk factors of intravascular cement leakage (CL) in cement-augmented fenestrated pedicle screw (CAFPS) insertion, particularly focusing on screw trajectory, bone density, and vertebral body volume.
Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted on 41 patients who underwent spinal fixation surgery with CAFPS from June 2022 to November 2024. Intravascular cement leakage (CL) was assessed using postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans.
Eur Spine J
September 2025
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-4-3, Asahimachi, Abenoku, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan.
Purpose: To identify risk factors for cement leakage (CL) in spinal fusion surgery using cement-augmented fenestrated pedicle screw (CAFPS). As a secondary objective, clinical outcomes were compared between CAFPS and conventional pedicle screw (CPS) in patients with osteoporosis.
Methods: We included 67 patients (272 screws) who underwent spinal fusion surgery with CAFPS and 104 patients with CPS.
J Orthop Surg Res
August 2025
Department of Orthopaedics, Lianshui People's Hospital, Kangda College of Nanjing Medical University, Lianshui, 223400, Jiangsu, China.
Background: Optimal management of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) remains controversial. This network meta‑analysis (NMA) evaluated the relative efficacy and safety of third‑generation percutaneous vertebral augmentation (TVA), percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP), percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP), and non‑surgical management (NSM) in OVCFs.
Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was conducted from inception to February 1, 2025, to identify clinical trials comparing ≥ 2 of these interventions.