Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background And Objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic profoundly influenced unrelated donor (UD) allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collections. Changes included efforts to minimize COVID-19 exposure to donors and cryopreservation of products. The extent to which the efficacy and safety of PBSC donations were affected by the pandemic is unknown.

Methods: Prospective cohort analysis of PBSC collections comparing pre-pandemic (01 April 2019-14 March 2020) and pandemic (15 March 2020-31 March 2022) eras.

Results: Of a total of 291 PBSC collections, cryopreservation was undertaken in 71.4% of pandemic donations compared to 1.1% pre-pandemic. The mean requested CD34 cell dose/kg increased from 4.9 ± 0.2 × 10 pre-pandemic to 5.4 ± 0.1 × 10 during the pandemic. Despite this increased demand, the proportion of collections that met or exceeded the requested cell dose did not change, and the mean CD34 cell doses collected (8.9 ± 0.5 × 10 pre-pandemic vs. 9.7 ± 0.4 × 10 during the pandemic) remained above requested targets. Central-line placements were more frequent, and severe adverse events in donors increased during the pandemic.

Conclusion: Cryopreservation of UD PBSC products increased during the pandemic. In association with this, requested cell doses for PBSC collections increased. Collection targets were met or exceeded at the same frequency, signaling high donor and collection center commitment. This was at the expense of increased donor or product-related severe adverse events. We highlight the need for heightened vigilance about donor safety as demands on donors have increased since the pandemic.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10047865PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30030270DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pbsc collections
16
covid-19 pandemic
8
pandemic
8
cd34 cell
8
pre-pandemic pandemic
8
met exceeded
8
requested cell
8
cell doses
8
severe adverse
8
adverse events
8

Similar Publications

We assessed whether the incidence and outcomes of chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease (cGvHD) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) have changed over 30 years. We studied 102,275 adults with hematological malignancies receiving a first alloHSCT from identical siblings or unrelated donors. We compared 3 decades: (I) 1990-1999 vs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Processing methods for hematopoietic stem cells vary significantly across institutions, with no standardized guidelines currently in place. This lack of standardization presents challenges in ensuring consistent quality and outcomes of stem cell transplantation procedures. This study investigated current practices in peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) processing and storage among transplant centers in Korea to establish a foundation for the development of standardized guidelines.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is a key therapeutic approach for various malignancies in recent years. Peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cells are typically collected using the apheresis technique following mobilization. However, during the collection process various challenges may arise.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Graft Source Choice.

Adv Exp Med Biol

June 2025

Division of Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapy, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.

Bone marrow grafts offer a lower risk of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) but require a surgical procedure and are associated with slower engraftment rates. Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) enable faster engraftment and easier collection but have historically been associated with a higher risk of GVHD. Umbilical cord blood (UCB) grafts are readily available and carry no donor risk, with a higher tolerance for human leukocyte antigen mismatches and a lower risk of GVHD, but they are constrained by limited cell doses and slower engraftment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background And Aim: Using a network meta-analysis, this study evaluates the clinical efficacy and safety of different types of stem cell therapy in regard to the recovery of neurological function, motor function, and daily living ability in ischemic stroke patients.

Methods: A computerized search of the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, CNKI, and Wanfang Database was performed to collect randomized controlled clinical studies published from the time of library construction to December 2024, on the use of stem cells to improve function in patients with ischemic stroke.

Results: A total of 19 studies and 1055 patients were included, comprising five stem cell types: bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMMNC), bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSC), progenitor cells (PC), peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC), and umbilical cord blood mesenchymal stem cells (UBMSC).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF