A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Unsupervised Time-Series Clustering of Left Atrial Strain for Cardiovascular Risk Assessment. | LitMetric

Unsupervised Time-Series Clustering of Left Atrial Strain for Cardiovascular Risk Assessment.

J Am Soc Echocardiogr

Research Unit Hypertension and Cardiovascular Epidemiology, KU Leuven Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. Electronic address:

Published: July 2023


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Early identification of individuals at high risk for developing cardiovascular (CV) events is of paramount importance for efficient risk management. Here, the authors investigated whether using unsupervised machine learning methods on time-series data of left atrial (LA) strain could distinguish clinically meaningful phenogroups associated with the risk for developing adverse events.

Methods: In 929 community-dwelling individuals (mean age, 51.6 years; 52.9% women), clinical and echocardiographic data were acquired, including LA strain traces, at baseline, and cardiac events were collected on average 6.3 years later. Two unsupervised learning techniques were used: (1) an ensemble of a deep convolutional neural network autoencoder with k-medoids and (2) a self-organizing map to cluster spatiotemporal patterns within LA strain curves. Clinical characteristics and cardiac outcome were used to evaluate the validity of the k clusters using the original cohort, while an external population cohort (n = 378) was used to validate the trained models.

Results: In both approaches, the optimal number of clusters was five. The first three clusters had differences in sex distribution and heart rate but had a similar low CV risk profile. On the other hand, cluster 5 had the worst CV profile and a higher prevalence of left ventricular remodeling and diastolic dysfunction compared with the other clusters. The respective indexes of cluster 4 were between those of clusters 1 to 3 and 5. After adjustment for traditional risk factors, cluster 5 had the highest risk for cardiac events compared with clusters 1, 2, and 3 (hazard ratio, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.09-1.70; P = .0063). Similar LA strain patterns were obtained when the models were applied to the external validation cohort, and clinical characteristics revealed similar CV risk profiles across all clusters.

Conclusion: Unsupervised machine learning algorithms used in time-series LA strain curves identified clinically meaningful clusters of LA deformation and provide incremental prognostic information over traditional risk factors.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2023.03.007DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

risk
9
left atrial
8
atrial strain
8
risk developing
8
unsupervised machine
8
machine learning
8
clinically meaningful
8
cardiac events
8
strain curves
8
clinical characteristics
8

Similar Publications