98%
921
2 minutes
20
Objectives: To evaluate and compare pharyngeal airway and tongue space changes after treatment with fixed functional appliances-Herbst and AdvanSync™ (Ormco, Orange, CA, USA) appliances-in skeletal class II patients in pre- and posttreatment lateral cephalograms.
Methods: For this randomized, controlled trial, 40 patients (21 male, 19 female) were divided into two groups-a Herbst group (mean age 12.6 ± 0.67 years) and an AdvanSync group (mean age 12.8 ± 0.66 years). Pre- and posttreatment (appliance therapy duration-8 months) lateral cephalograms were traced using a software program to evaluate pharyngeal airway and tongue space changes.
Results: Nasopharyngeal airway, velopharyngeal airway, glossopharyngeal airway, and hypopharyngeal airway increased in the Herbst group by 2.12 mm (p ≤ 0.001), 2.33 mm (p ≤ 0.001), 2.40 mm (p ≤ 0.01), and 1.57 mm (p ≤ 0.05), while in the AdvanSync group the increases were 1.89 mm (p ≤ 0.001), 1.21 mm (p ≤ 0.001), 1.18 mm (p ≤ 0.001), and 1.53 mm (p ≤ 0.001), respectively. In the Herbst group, tongue length and height increases were 2.04 mm (p ≤ 0.01) and 3.74 mm (p ≤ 0.001), while the values in the AdvanSync group were 2.41 mm (p ≤ 0.05) and 2.69 mm (p ≤ 0.001). The change of the tongue tip from the lower occlusal plane was 0.69 mm (p ≤ 0.001) in the Herbst group and 0.77 mm (p ≤ 0.001) in the AdvanSync group. The velopharyngeal airway dimension was correlated positively with that of the retroglossal oropharyngeal airway, which in-turn positively correlated with the laryngopharyngeal airway which correlated well with the distance of the tongue tip from the lower occlusal plane.
Conclusions: The airway dimensions and tongue parameters increased significantly in both treatment groups in the present study. These changes were higher in the Herbst appliance than in the AdvanSync group, except for the distance of the tongue tip from the lower occlusal plane. A significant difference between the pharyngeal airways was found only for the retropalatal oropharyngeal airway.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00056-023-00449-3 | DOI Listing |
J Orthod Sci
March 2025
Unit of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Deformities, Oral Health and Sciences Centre (OHSC), Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Introduction: Dental pulp may respond differently to adverse orthodontic forces. Major physiological effects of optimum orthodontic force application on dental pulp are vascular pulpal changes, pulpal calcification, and fibrosis. Functional appliances taking anchorage from the dentition tend to exert reciprocal higher orthodontic forces.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFOrthod Craniofac Res
December 2024
Biomedical Stomatology Research Group, School of Dentistry, University of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.
Objective: This study aims to utilize the finite element method (FEM) to compare the dentoalveolar and mandibular effects associated with anterior mandibular repositioning using AdvanSync® (ADV) and Twin Block (TB).
Methods: A patient with Class II skeletal malocclusion and mandibular retrognathism was selected. A TB appliance was subsequently applied.
J Orofac Orthop
May 2024
Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Faculty of Dental Sciences, SGT University, Gurgaon (Haryana), India.
Objectives: To evaluate and compare pharyngeal airway and tongue space changes after treatment with fixed functional appliances-Herbst and AdvanSync™ (Ormco, Orange, CA, USA) appliances-in skeletal class II patients in pre- and posttreatment lateral cephalograms.
Methods: For this randomized, controlled trial, 40 patients (21 male, 19 female) were divided into two groups-a Herbst group (mean age 12.6 ± 0.
Cureus
January 2023
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Dayananda Sagar College of Dental Sciences, Bengaluru, IND.
Objectives: The objective is to assess and compare whether AdvanSync gives better skeletal, dental, and soft tissue outcomes than Forsus fixed functional appliance in post-pubertal skeletal Class II malocclusion patients.
Methodology: A prospective study was conducted using 3D-CBCT of patients taken before and after fixed functional appliance therapy. The sample consisted of 16 patients divided into two groups: Group 1 was treated with Forsus and group 2 with AdvanSync appliance.
J Clin Exp Dent
October 2020
Roseman University of Health Sciences, College of Dental Medicine, Henderson, NV, USA.
Background: Rigid fixed functional appliances are most commonly used to correct skeletal Class II malocclusions. The objective of this study was to assess orthodontists' preference of different rigid fixed functional appliances used in the U.S.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF