98%
921
2 minutes
20
Purpose: Cochlear implant (CI) recipients with hearing preservation experience significant improvements in speech recognition with electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) as compared to with a CI alone, although outcomes across EAS users vary. The individual differences in performance may be due in part to default mapping procedures, which result in electric frequency-to-place mismatches for the majority of EAS users. This study assessed the influence of electric mismatches on the early speech recognition for EAS users.
Method: Twenty-one participants were randomized at EAS activation to listen exclusively with a default or place-based map. For both groups, the unaided thresholds determined the acoustic cutoff frequency (i.e., > 65 dB HL). For default maps, the electric filter frequencies were assigned to avoid spectral gaps in frequency information but created varying magnitudes of mismatches. For place-based maps, the electric filter frequencies were assigned to avoid frequency-to-place mismatches. Recognition of consonant-nucleus-consonant words and vowels was assessed at activation and 1, 3, and 6 months postactivation.
Results: For participants with default maps, electric mismatch at 1500 Hz ranged from 2 to -12.0 semitones ( = -5 semitones). Poorer performance was observed for those with larger magnitudes of electric mismatch. This effect was observed through 6 months of EAS listening experience.
Conclusions: The present sample of EAS users experienced better initial performance when electric mismatches were small or eliminated. These data suggest the utility of methods that reduce electric mismatches, such as place-based mapping procedures. Investigation is ongoing to determine whether these differences persist with long-term EAS use.
Supplemental Material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.22096523.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10166189 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/2022_AJA-21-00254 | DOI Listing |
Sci Rep
July 2025
SOUND Lab, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
The electrode to auditory nerve interface (ENI) is often considered a bottleneck for information transmission for listeners using a cochlear implant (CI). Clinically, it could be beneficial to have a CI programming plan based on optimising information flow based on an individual's ENI status. This review explores whether re-mappings informed by the viability of ENI can improve the speech perception (noise and/or quiet) of adult CI users.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFOtol Neurotol
July 2025
ENT Department, Hospital Oberwart, Oberwart, Austria.
Objectives: To investigate whether there is a difference in frequency parameters between anatomy-based fitting (ABF) using a preoperative CT scan and clinically based fitting (CBF).
Study Design: Monocentric retrospective registry study.
Setting: Tertiary academic medical center.
Otol Neurotol
September 2025
Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Objective: Review the relationship of tonotopic mismatch with the speech recognition of cochlear implant (CI) users with unilateral hearing loss (UHL; also known as single-sided deafness).
Patients: Twenty-seven adults (≥18 yr of age) with late-onset UHL.
Intervention: Cochlear implantation.
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
May 2025
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
May 2025
Department of Otolaryngology, Ningbo No.2 Hospital, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China.