A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Association of Tonotopic Mismatch With the Speech Recognition of Cochlear Implant Users With Unilateral Hearing Loss. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Objective: Review the relationship of tonotopic mismatch with the speech recognition of cochlear implant (CI) users with unilateral hearing loss (UHL; also known as single-sided deafness).

Patients: Twenty-seven adults (≥18 yr of age) with late-onset UHL.

Intervention: Cochlear implantation.

Main Outcome Measures: Speech recognition was assessed at 6 months post-activation with consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) words in the CI alone condition (contralateral ear masked). In the combined condition (CI plus the normal-hearing ear), masked speech recognition was assessed using AzBio sentences in a 10-talker masker (0-dB signal-to-noise ratio) in three target-to-masker configurations. Tonotopic mismatch was calculated as the semitone deviation between the center filter frequency and the cochlear place frequency of the most apical electrode contact.

Results: There was a significant, negative association between tonotopic mismatch and CNC scores ( r27 = -0.43, p = 0.013) and masked speech recognition when the target was from the front and the masker was presented toward the normal-hearing ear ( r27 = -0.36, p = 0.033).

Conclusions: The speech recognition of adult CI users with UHL in the CI alone and bilateral listening conditions may be significantly influenced by tonotopic mismatches. These findings support the need for prospective investigation of methods to reduce or eliminate tonotopic mismatches (e.g., implantation of electrode arrays that approximate cochlear place and/or individualized mapping of filter frequencies) for CI users with UHL.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004543DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

speech recognition
24
tonotopic mismatch
16
association tonotopic
8
mismatch speech
8
recognition cochlear
8
cochlear implant
8
implant users
8
users unilateral
8
unilateral hearing
8
hearing loss
8

Similar Publications