Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background & Aims: Large (≥20 mm) nonpedunculated colorectal polyps (LNPCPs) may have synchronous LNPCPs in up to 18% of cases. The nature of this relationship has not been investigated. We aimed to examine the relationship between individual LNPCP characteristics and synchronous colonic LNPCPs.

Methods: Consecutive patients referred for resection of LNPCPs over 130 months until March 2022 were enrolled. Serrated lesions and mixed granularity LNPCPs were excluded from analysis. Patients with multiple LNPCPs resected were identified, and the largest was labelled as dominant. The primary outcome was the identification of individual lesion characteristics associated with the presence of synchronous LNPCPs.

Results: There were 3149 of 3381 patients (93.1%) who had a single LNPCP. In 232 (6.9%) a synchronous lesion was detected. Solitary lesions had a median size of 35 mm with a predominant Paris 0-IIa morphology (42.9%) and right colon location (59.5%). In patients with ≥2 LNPCPs, the dominant lesion had a median size of 40 mm, Paris 0-IIa (47.6%) morphology, and right colon location (65.9%). In this group, 35.8% of dominant LNPCPs were non-granular compared with 18.7% in the solitary LNPCP cohort. Non-granular (NG)-LNPCPs were more likely to demonstrate synchronous disease, with left colon NG-LNPCPs demonstrating greater risk (odds ratio, 4.78; 95% confidence interval, 2.95-7.73) than right colon NG-LNPCPs (odds ratio, 1.99; 95% confidence interval, 1.39-2.86).

Conclusions: We found that 6.9% of LNPCPs have synchronous disease, with NG-LNPCPs demonstrating a greater than 4-fold increased risk. With post-colonoscopy interval cancers exceeding 5%, endoscopists must be cognizant of an individual's LNPCP phenotype when examining the colon at both index procedure and surveillance.

Clinicaltrials: gov, NCT01368289; NCT02000141; NCT02198729.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2023.01.034DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lnpcps
8
lnpcps synchronous
8
median size
8
paris 0-iia
8
colon location
8
synchronous disease
8
colon ng-lnpcps
8
ng-lnpcps demonstrating
8
demonstrating greater
8
odds ratio
8

Similar Publications

Updates in the endoscopic management of colorectal polyps.

Indian J Gastroenterol

September 2025

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, 2145, Australia.

Endoscopic resection of pre-malignant polyps remains a cornerstone of colorectal cancer prevention. This review provides an evidence-based analysis of the current approaches to endoscopic colorectal polyp management. Cold snare resection is recommended for small and diminutive polyps.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background and Study Aims Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) techniques for large (≥20 mm) non-pedunculated colorectal polyps (LNPCPs) have expanded with the introduction of ablation and cold EMR (cEMR). This study assessed adverse events for newer EMR techniques including cEMR compared to hot EMR. Patients and Methods We conducted a secondary analysis of four prospective multicenter studies of consecutive patients with LNPCPs undergoing EMR from 2019-2024.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background And Aims: Data on endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for residual neoplasia after incomplete endoscopic resection (ER) of large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps (LNPCPs) remain scarce. We aimed to evaluate and compare outcomes of ESD in patients with treatment-naïve (control) lesions versus those with previous failed ER.

Methods: This was a multicenter propensity-score (PS) match study of ESDs performed for LNPCPs between January 2021 and September 2024.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background And Aims: Delayed post-polypectomy bleeding (DPPB) is an established adverse event after EMR of large non-pedunculated colon polyps (LNPCPs). Although clipping is commonly used in clinical settings, particularly for LNPCPs and for patients on antithrombotic agents, the cost-effectiveness of prophylactic clipping is not well studied.

Methods: We conducted an incremental cost-effectiveness analysis comparing prophylactic clipping (PC) versus no clipping (NC) for DPPB over a 1-year time horizon using a Markov decision tree model based on pooled randomized controlled trial data.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aimed to compare the risk of recurrence and adverse events (AEs) between cold snare polypectomy (CSP) and hot endoscopic mucosal resection (H-EMR) for large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps (LNPCPs).A systematic search of Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases until August 2024 was performed for studies comparing recurrence, bleeding, and perforation rates between CSP and H-EMR for LNPCPs ≥15 mm. A random-effects meta-analysis, with heterogeneity measured with I2, was conducted to generate pooled risk ratios (RRs) with 95%CIs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF