A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

The evolution of registration standards for internationally qualified midwives in Australia. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Registration as an internationally qualified midwife in Australia can be challenging, as the individual must meet rigorous education and professional competency assessment standards.

Aim: The purpose of this discussion is to present an overview of the evolution of registration standards for internationally qualified midwives in Australia from 2000 to 2020 and evaluate their effectiveness in promoting internationally qualified midwives' professional integration.

Results: Australian registration policies for internationally qualified midwives have undergone significant change over the last 20 years. In 2010, registration policy and governance moved from state or territory to national jurisdiction, then these standards were upgraded in 2014, and finally transitioned to an outcome-based assessment (OBA) program in 2020. Inconsistency and lack of transparency in established registration policies and their implementation were revealed, most notably when bridging programs for internationally qualified midwives from non-English speaking backgrounds were discontinued in Australia in 2015, despite reference in the NMBA policy as an available transition program from 2000 to 2020. The implementation of OBA in 2020, which occurred after a significant delay, complicated registration processes further with inclusion of two levels of assessment (MCQ examination and OSCE) and associated expenses.

Conclusion: Evidence-based strategies and regulatory adjustments are necessary to effectively register internationally qualified midwives in Australia, particularly those from non-English speaking backgrounds.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2023.103606DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

internationally qualified
28
qualified midwives
20
midwives australia
12
evolution registration
8
registration standards
8
standards internationally
8
2000 2020
8
registration policies
8
non-english speaking
8
speaking backgrounds
8

Similar Publications