What Factors Are Associated With Delayed Wound Closure in Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Adult Both-bone Forearm Fractures?

Background: Delayed wound closure is often used after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of both-bone forearm fractures to reduce the risk of skin necrosis and subsequent infection caused by excessive swelling. However, no studies we are aware of have evaluated factors associated with the use of delayed wound closure after ORIF.

Questions/purposes: (1) What proportion of patients undergo delayed wound closure after ORIF of adult both-bone forearm fractures? (2) What factors are associated with delayed wound closure?

Methods: The medical records of all patients who underwent ORIF with plate fixation for both-bone fractures by the adult orthopaedic trauma service at our institution were considered potentially eligible for analysis. Between January 2010 and April 2022, we treated 74 patients with ORIF for both-bone forearm fractures. Patients were excluded if they had fractures that were fixed more than 2 weeks from injury (six patients), if their fracture was treated with an intramedullary nail (one patient), or if the patient experienced compartment syndrome preoperatively (one patient). No patients with Gustilo-Anderson Type IIIB and C open fractures were included. Based on these criteria, 89% (66 of 74) of the patients were eligible. No further patients were excluded for loss of follow-up because the primary endpoint was the use of delayed wound closure, which was performed at the time of ORIF. However, one further patient was excluded for having bilateral forearm fractures to ensure that each patient had a single fracture for statistical analysis. Thus, 88% (65 of 74) of patients were included in the analysis. These patients were captured by an electronic medical record search of CPT code 25575. The mean ± SD age was 34 ± 15 years and mean BMI was 28 ± 7 kg/m 2 . The mean follow-up duration was 4 ± 5 months. The primary endpoint was the use of delayed wound closure, which was determined at the time of definitive fixation if tension-free closure could not be achieved. All surgeons used a volar Henry or modified Henry approach and a dorsal subcutaneous approach to the ulna for ORIF. Univariate logistic regression was used to identify which factors might be associated with delayed wound closure. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was then performed for male gender, open fractures, age, and BMI.

Results: Twenty percent (13 of 65) of patients underwent delayed wound closure, 18% (12 of 65) of which occurred in patients who had high-energy injuries and 14% (nine of 65) in patients who had open fractures. Being a man (adjusted odds ratio 9.9 [95% confidence interval 1 to 87]; p = 0.04) was independently associated with delayed wound closure, after adjusting for open fractures, age, and BMI.

Conclusion: One of five patients had delayed wound closure after ORIF of both-bone forearm fractures. Being a man was independently associated with greater odds of delayed wound closure. Surgeons should counsel all patients with these fractures about the possibility of delayed wound closure, with particular attention to men with high-energy and open fractures. Future larger-scale studies are necessary to confirm which factors are associated with the use of delayed wound closure in ORIF of both-bone fractures and its effects on fracture healing.

Level Of Evidence: Level III, therapeutic study.