98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: Sarcopenia indicates poor prognosis in various malignancies. We evaluated the association of sarcopenia with overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in metastatic esophageal cancer (MEC) patients, a population often presenting with poor nutritional status.
Methods: In newly diagnosed MEC patients managed at the Princess Margaret (PM) Cancer Centre (diagnosed 2006-2015), total muscle area, visceral adiposity (VA), and subcutaneous adiposity (SA) were quantified on abdominal computed tomography at L3. Sarcopenia was determined using published cutoffs, based on sex and height.
Results: Of 202 MEC patients, most were male (166/82%), < 65 years (116/57%), and had adenocarcinoma histology (141/70%); 110/54% had recurrent MEC after initial curative-intent treatment; 92/46% presented with de novo MEC. At stage IV diagnosis, 20/10% were underweight, 97/48% were normal-weight and 84/42% were overweight/obese; 103/51% were sarcopenic. Sarcopenia was associated with worse median OS (4.6 vs. 7.9 months; log-rank p = 0.03) and 1-year survival, even after adjusting for other body composition variables (e.g., BMI, VA, and SA): adjusted-HR 1.51 [95% CI 1.1-2.2, p = 0.02]. In post hoc analysis, sarcopenia was highly prognostic in adenocarcinomas (p = 0.003), but not squamous cell carcinomas (SCC). In patients receiving palliative systemic treatment (104/51%), sarcopenia was associated with shorter PFS (p = 0.004) in adenocarcinoma patients (75/72%).
Conclusions: In metastatic esophageal adenocarcinomas, sarcopenia is associated with worse PFS and OS. In metastatic esophageal SCC, there was a non-significant trend for worse PFS but no association with OS. In order to offset the poor prognosis associated with sarcopenia particularly in metastatic esophageal adenocarcinoma patients, future research should focus on possible countermeasures.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10388-022-00981-y | DOI Listing |
Ann Med Surg (Lond)
September 2025
Department of ENT- Head and Neck, Nepal Cancer Hospital and Research Center, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Introduction And Importance: Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) of the vallecula is exceptionally rare and presents significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. This case highlights the complexities in diagnosing and managing MEC in an atypical location, where initial benign findings led to recurrent symptoms and required further investigation and intervention.
Case Presentation: A 64-year-old diabetic male presented with progressive hoarseness, dysphagia, and intermittent shortness of breath.
World J Surg
September 2025
Division of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Background: Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) of the breast is a very rare salivary gland-like tumor, accounting for 0.2%-0.3% of all breast cancers (BC).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFOral Dis
August 2025
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Head and Neck Oncology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Objective: Cyst-like central mucoepidermoid carcinoma (CC-MEC) is a special type of MEC in the jaw and clinically like a cyst. To analyze the clinicopathological features, treatment, and prognosis of CC-MEC.
Methods: From 2018 to 2023, nine patients with CC-MEC who underwent surgery were retrospectively investigated.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
September 2025
Life Sciences Department, Barcelona Supercomputing Center, Barcelona 08034, Spain.
Epidemiological evidence shows that some diseases tend to co-occur; more exactly, certain groups of patients with a given disease are at a higher risk of developing a specific secondary condition. Here, we develop an approach to generate a disease network that uses the accumulating RNA-seq data on human diseases to significantly match an unprecedented proportion of known comorbidities, providing plausible biological models for such co-occurrences and effectively mirroring the underlying structure of complex disease relationships. Furthermore, 64% of the known disease pairs can be explained by analyzing groups of patients with similar expression profiles, highlighting the importance of patient stratification in the study of comorbidities.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPLoS Med
August 2025
Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, Colorado United States of America.
Background: Clinical determination of bone fracture healing remains qualitative, typically determined through the combination of plain film radiographs, clinical assessment, and patient-reported pain. Importantly, standard radiographs can only detect bone formation in the fracture site after sufficient tissue mineralization has occurred, restricting utility to the later stages of bone repair. A more rigorous method for determining fracture healing progression could significantly improve patient care.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF