Refining the delivery and therapeutic efficacy of cetuximab using focused ultrasound in a mouse model of glioblastoma: An Zr-cetuximab immunoPET study.

Introduction: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and deadly form of primary brain tumor. Between 30 % and 60 % of GBM are characterized by overexpression of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR). The anti-EGFR antibody Cetuximab (CTX) showed a favorable effect for EGFR colorectal cancer but failed to demonstrate efficacy for GBM. Insufficient CTX passage through the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and the blood-tumor barrier (BTB) is assumed to be the primary determinant of the limited efficacy of this immunotherapy.

Objective: Using positron emission tomography (PET) imaging, we have previously demonstrated that focused ultrasound (FUS) combined with microbubbles (µB) allowed significant and persistent delivery of CTX across the BBB in healthy mice. In the current study, we investigated by PET imaging the combination impact of CTX and FUS on orthotopic GBM preclinical model.

Methods: After radiolabeling CTX with the long half-life isotope Zr, PET images have been acquired overtime in mice bearing U251 (EGFR) with or without FUS treatment. Autoradiography combined with immunofluorescence staining was used to corroborate CTX delivery with EGFR expression. A survival study was conducted simultaneously to evaluate the therapeutic benefit of repeated CTX monotherapy associated or not with FUS.

Results: Ex vivo analysis confirmed that FUS enhanced and homogenized the delivery of CTX into all the FUS exposure area, including the tumor and the contralateral hemisphere at the early-time-point. Interestingly, FUS did not improve the long-term accumulation and retention of CTX in the tumor compared with the control group (no FUS). No significant difference in the CTX treatment efficacy, determined by the survival between FUS and non-FUS groups, has been either observed. This result is consistent with the absence of change in the CTX distribution through the GBM tumor after FUS. The neuroinflammation induced by FUS is not significant enough to explain the failure of the CTX delivery improvement.

Conclusion: All together, these data suggest that the role of FUS combined with µB on the CTX distribution, even after multiple therapeutic sessions and glial cell activation is insufficient to improve survival of GBM mice compared with CTX treatment alone in this model.