98%
921
2 minutes
20
Objectives: This work aimed to synthesize a novel injectable alginate impression material and evaluate its accuracy.
Methods: Certain proportions of sodium alginate, trisodium phosphate dodecahydrate, potassium fluorotitanate, diatomaceous earth, and other ingredients were dissolved in water and mixed evenly with a planetary centrifugal mixer to obtain a certain viscosity base paste. Certain proportions of calcium sulfate hemihydrate, magnesium oxide, glycerin, and polyethylene glycol (PEG) 400 were mixed evenly with a planetary centrifugal mixer to obtain the reactor paste with the same viscosity as the base paste. The base and reactor pastes were poured into a two-cylinder cartridge at a 2∶1 volume ratio. A gun device was used to accomplish mixing by compressing materials into a mixing tip. The samples were divided into three groups: injectable alginate impression materials (IA group) as the experimental group, and Jeltrate alginate impression materials (JA group) and Silagum-putty/light addition silicone rubber impression materials (SI group) as the two control groups.
Results: Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) showed that the injectable alginate impression materials had a denser structure and fewer bubbles than the commercial alginate impression material. The accuracy of the three kinds of impression materials was evaluated by 3D image superposition. The deviations between the three test group models and the standard model (trueness) were 49.58 μm±1.453 μm (IA group), 54.75 μm±7.264 μm (JA group), and 30.92 μm±1.013 μm (SI group). The deviations of the models within each test group (precision) were 85.79 μm±8.191 μm (IA group), 97.65 μm±11.060 μm (JA group), and 56.51 μm±4.995 μm (SI group). Significant differences in trueness and precision were found among the three kinds of impression materials (<0.05).
Conclusions: The accuracy of the new injectable alginate impression material was better than that of the traditional powder-type alginate impression material but worse than that of the addition silicone rubber impression materials. The novel injec-table alginate impression material demonstrated good operation performance and impression accuracy, showing broad application prospect.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9763959 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.7518/hxkq.2022.06.006 | DOI Listing |
Cureus
July 2025
Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Hitkarini Dental College and Hospital, Jabalpur, IND.
Effective infection control in dental practice is essential, particularly during impression-making procedures that risk transmitting pathogens such as HIV and hepatitis B. This review evaluates how spray and immersion disinfection methods affect the dimensional accuracy of impression materials. A comprehensive search of electronic databases identified studies assessing the impact of these disinfection techniques on various materials.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAm J Dent
August 2025
Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey.
Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of hydrogen peroxide, sodium hypochlorite, and glutaraldehyde in disinfecting dental impression materials; alginate, polyether, condensation silicone and polyvinyl siloxane. The objectives include comparing the microbial reduction (Log R values) and assessing the interaction between microorganisms and disinfectants on these materials.
Methods: Common dental pathogens (Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus hirae, and Streptococcus mutans) were used to contaminate the impression materials.
Sci Rep
August 2025
Department of Stomatology, Yuhuan People's Hospital, Taizhou, 317600, Zhejiang, China.
Accurate digital impressions are crucial in modern dentistry, particularly for capturing fine details of various dental preparations. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of variations in the sizes of crown and inlay specimen on the accuracy of three digital impression techniques. Nine crown and nine inlay specimens were fabricated according to American Dental Association Standard No.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFChildren (Basel)
June 2025
Biomedical Research Institute of Murcia Pascual Parrilla-IMIB, 30120 Murcia, Spain.
Background/objectives: Alginate dental impressions are often among the most anxiety-inducing procedures for pediatric patients due to discomfort caused by nausea, gagging, and the vomiting reflex. This technique frequently raises anxiety levels in children. In contrast, intraoral scanners are increasingly used in clinical practice and offer a more comfortable alternative.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMC Oral Health
July 2025
Faculty of Dentistry, Pediatric Dentistry and Dental Public Health Department, Alexandria University, Champollion St., El Azareta, Alexandria, Egypt.
Background: This study examines the effects of laser acupuncture and electroacupuncture on anxiety in children with excessive gag reflexes during dental impressions.
Methods: A three-armed randomized controlled trial involved 63 pediatric dental patients aged 6-9 with excessive gag reflexes. Participants were equally divided into three groups: group 1 (laser acupuncture), group 2 (electroacupuncture), and group 3 (negative control with a deactivated device).