98%
921
2 minutes
20
In 2017, to reduce the burden of measles and rubella, a nation-wide measles-rubella campaign was launched in India. Despite detailed planning efforts that involved many stakeholders, vaccine refusal arose in several communities during the campaign. As strategic health communication and promotion is critical in any vaccine campaign, we sought to document lessons learned from the 2017 MR campaign from a strategic health communication and promotion perspective to capture lessons learned. To inform future campaigns, we conducted in-depth interviews through a perspective that is not usually captured, that of government and civil society stakeholders that had experience in vaccine campaign implementation (n = 21). We interviewed stakeholders at the national level and within three states that had diverse experiences with the campaign. Three key themes related to strategic health communication and promotion emerged: the importance of sensitizing communities at all levels through relevant and timely information about the vaccine and the vaccine campaign, leveraging key influencers to deliver tailored messaging about the importance of vaccines and mitigating vaccine misinformation rapidly. Our study findings have important implications for health communication and promotion research related to vaccine campaigns. The field must continue to enhance vaccine campaign efforts by identifying important health communication and promotion factors, including the importance of sensitization, trusted messengers that use tailored messaging and mitigating misinformation, as vaccine campaigns are crucial in improving vaccine acceptance.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daac116 | DOI Listing |
JMIR Res Protoc
September 2025
Department of Health Services Research & Administration, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, United States.
Background: With the availability of more advanced and effective treatments, life expectancy has improved among patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC), but this makes communication with their medical oncologist more complex. Some patients struggle to learn about their therapeutic options and to understand and articulate their preferences. Mobile health (mHealth) apps can enhance patient-provider communication, playing a crucial role in the diagnosis, treatment, quality of life, and outcomes for patients living with MBC.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Med Internet Res
September 2025
Institute of Hospital Management, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Background: Telemedicine is developing rapidly, presenting new opportunities and challenges for physicians and patients. Limited research has examined physicians' behavior during the process of adopting telemedicine and related factors.
Objective: This study aimed to identify perceived barriers and enablers of physicians' adoption of telemedicine and to develop intervention strategies.
Oncologist
September 2025
Section of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stephenson Cancer Center and the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK.
Background: Effective communication of mission and vision statements (MVS) is important for medical institutions seeking to connect with patients, staff, and the community. This study assessed the composition, readability, and topics addressed within MVS among NCI-designated cancer centers and affiliated hospitals.
Methods: We extracted MVS data from institutional websites for 65 NCI-designated cancer centers and their affiliated hospitals.
J Telemed Telecare
September 2025
Department of Emergency Medicine, Mass General Brigham, Boston, MA, USA.
IntroductionThe rapid expansion of virtual ambulatory care has included both video and audio-only modalities. The impact of visit modality on patient experience is poorly understood, particularly in the interplay with social health determinants and technical aspects of virtual care. We sought to characterize differences in the patient-reported experience of virtual care between video and audio-only modalities, and to understand drivers of these differences.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF