98%
921
2 minutes
20
Aim: To scrutinize Kesling and elastomeric orthodontic separators, focusing on the separating effect as well as patients' perception of pain together with discomfort.
Materials And Methods: The separators tested were elastomeric as well as Kesling separators. Thirty subjects, scheduled for treatment having a fixed orthodontic appliance, were categorized into two groups. In group I subjects, elastomeric separators were placed, whereas in group II subjects, Kesling separators were placed. After 3 days, the extent of separation was recorded with a leaf gauge. A questionnaire of eight questions and visual analog scale were used to note the patient perceptions of pain and discomfort.
Results: The mean separation formed by elastomeric and Kesling separator was 0.0457 and 0.0437 mm, respectively, of which elastomeric separator had made highest separation than the other separator used for the generation of separation at day 1 whereas the mean separation created by the elastomeric and Kesling separator at day 2 was 0.2327 mm and 0.1903 mm, respectively. 46.7% of patients on day 1, and on day 2, 56.7% of patients reported discomfort but not pain, while 73.3% of patients on day 3 reported discomfort but not pain from both types of separator. On day 1, 6.7% of patients, 13.3% on day 2, and 6.7% again on day 3 reported feeling pressure but no pain or discomfort.
Conclusion: Elastomeric separators exhibited the highest separation compared to Kesling used for the separation, at all three days. The Kesling separator was a separator of choice in cases where the interproximal contact was tight.
Clinical Significance: Discomfort and pain due to separator will be minimized by reducing the duration of separator placement. Hence treatment acceptability will be more. There is no significant difference found in separation by increasing the day.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
J Contemp Dent Pract
May 2022
Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, Dental Institute, RIMS, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India.
Aim: To scrutinize Kesling and elastomeric orthodontic separators, focusing on the separating effect as well as patients' perception of pain together with discomfort.
Materials And Methods: The separators tested were elastomeric as well as Kesling separators. Thirty subjects, scheduled for treatment having a fixed orthodontic appliance, were categorized into two groups.
J Pharm Bioallied Sci
June 2021
Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Daswani Dental College, Kota, Rajasthan, India.
Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the extent of separation and perception of pain and discomfort with the use of three different orthodontic separators.
Materials And Methods: A total of sixty participants (26 males and 34 females) aged between 18 and 25 years were enrolled in this study. Participants were divided into three experimental groups: Group I: elastomeric separator, Group II: Dumbbell separators, and Group III: Kesling Separators.
Dental Press J Orthod
May 2019
Maulana Azad Institute of Dental Sciences, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics (New Delhi, India).
Introduction: Various types of separators have been advocated, but the ideal separator should produce optimum separation with minimal pain and discomfort.
Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the amount of separation achieved by three different types of separators (Elastomeric, Kesling and Kansal), and to assess the associated pain and discomfort.
Methods: A random single-blind split-mouth study was conducted on 108 patients seeking fixed orthodontic treatment, in which two different separators were used on each side in both the arches for a single patient.
J Clin Diagn Res
August 2014
Senior Resident, Department of Orthodontics, S N Medical College & Hospital, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India .
Aim: To evaluate the rapidity and amount of separation of four different types of separators (i.e. Elastomeric separators, Dumbbell separators, Kesling springs and NEET springs) and also the percentage of loss of these separators.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSolid State Nucl Magn Reson
May 2000
Department of Chemistry, West Virginia University, Morgantown 26506, USA.
Solid-state NMR experiments are performed on amorphous blends of tri-p-tolylamine (TTA) and polycarbonate. Amines that are similar to TTA are blended with polycarbonates and used as photoconducting components in xerography. Because of its simple molecular structure, TTA is a charge-transporting molecule that is used as a model to understand charge transport in photoconducting materials.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF