98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: Older patients with breast cancer have good prognosis and most die from diseases other than breast cancer. Previous studies suggested that the surgical extent in older patients could be reduced. We aimed to compare survival outcomes in patients aged ≥70 years with clinically node-negative breast cancer, based on whether axillary surgery was performed.
Methods: A total of 2,995 patients with breast cancer aged ≥70 years who underwent breast surgery were included in the Korean Breast Cancer Registry. Patients were classified into two groups according to the performance of axillary surgery. We used propensity score matching for demographic and treatment factors to minimize selection bias. We compared the 5-year overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS).
Results: Among 708 patients after 3:1 propensity score matching, 531 underwent breast surgery with axillary surgery and 177 underwent breast surgery alone. Of all patients, 51.7% had T1 stage, and 73.2% underwent mastectomy. Approximately 31.2% of patients received chemotherapy. Among patients who did not undergo axillary surgery, the 5-year OS and BCSS rates were 85.2% and 96.7%, respectively. The hazard ratio of axillary surgery for OS was 0.943 (95% confidence interval 0.652-1.365, p = 0.757), indicating no significant difference between two groups.
Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that axillary surgery in a matched cohort of older patients with breast cancer and clinically negative nodes does not provide a survival benefit compared to patients undergoing breast surgery alone. These findings suggest that axillary surgery may be safely omitted in a select group of patients aged ≥70 years with clinically node-negative cancer. Further studies are needed to identify potential candidates for omitting axillary surgery.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2022.07.005 | DOI Listing |
Ann Surg Oncol
September 2025
Department of Breast Surgery, General Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Eur J Breast Health
September 2025
Department of Pathology, İstanbul Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul University, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Objective: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a key procedure for evaluating axillary lymph node status in early breast cancer, offering lower morbidity than axillary lymph node dissection. Intraoperative evaluation (IOE) of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) with methods like frozen section (FS) and imprint cytology (IC) aid in making immediate surgical decisions, although IOE accuracy may vary due to several factors.
Materials And Methods: This retrospective study involved 2,528 patients with invasive breast cancer who underwent SLNB at a single institution from 2012 to 2024.
Surg Case Rep
August 2025
Department of Thoracic Surgery, University of Toyama, Toyama, Toyama, Japan.
Introduction: Lung cancer with chest wall (CW) involvement can develop metastases directly to the ipsilateral axillary lymph node (ALN) via lymphatic flow of the CW. Such metastatic ALNs should be evaluated as locoregional metastases, and multimodal treatment of patients with stage III lung cancer including surgery may be utilized.
Case Presentation: A 59-year-old man presented with a chief complaint of back pain and was diagnosed as having primary lung adenocarcinoma of the right upper lobe with CW involvement and an ipsilateral ALN metastasis (cT3N0M1b: IVA, 8th edition of the tumor, node, metastasis).
Ann Surg Oncol
September 2025
Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Cureus
July 2025
Vascular Surgery, Acıbadem City Clinic Tokuda Hospital, Sofia, BGR.
Traumatic limb pseudoaneurysms are rare vascular complications that can cause acute limb ischemia and require urgent treatment. Traditionally addressed through open surgical repair, advances in endovascular techniques have introduced less invasive options, particularly beneficial for high-risk patients. This article presents two cases illustrating individualized decision-making in choosing between endovascular and open surgical repair.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF