Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

The UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3; UCLA-LSV3) is widely used for assessing loneliness. Nevertheless, the validity of this scale for assessing loneliness in individuals with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder has not been determined. Additionally, studies validating the eight-item and three-item versions of UCLA-LSV3 have not included individuals with severe mental illness; therefore, whether the short versions are comparable to the full 20-item version of UCLA-LSV3 for this population is unclear. The present study examined the unidimensional structure, internal consistency, concurrent validity, and test-retest reliability of the Chinese versions of UCLA-LSV3 (i.e., 20-item, 8-item, and 3-item versions) to determine which version is most appropriate for assessing loneliness in individuals with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder in Taiwan. A total of 300 participants (267 with schizophrenia and 33 with schizoaffective disorder) completed the scales, comprising UCLA-LSV3, the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), the suicidality module of the Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia-Epidemiological Version (K-SADS-E), and the family and peer Adaptation, Partnership, Growth, Affection, and Resolve (APGAR) index. Construct validity was evaluated through confirmatory factor analysis. The three versions of UCLA-LSV3 were compared with the CES-D, the suicidality module of the K-SADS-E, and the family and peer APGAR index to establish concurrent validity. The results indicated that all three versions of UCLA-LSV3 exhibited acceptable to satisfactory psychometric properties in terms of unidimensional constructs, concurrent validity, and test-retest reliability. The full version of UCLA-LSV3 had the best performance, followed by the eight-item version and the three-item version. Moreover, the three versions had relatively strong associations with each other. Therefore, when deliberating which version of UCLA-LSV3 is the best choice for assessing loneliness in individuals with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, healthcare providers and therapists should consider time availability and practicality.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9319140PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19148443DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

schizophrenia schizoaffective
20
schizoaffective disorder
20
three versions
16
individuals schizophrenia
16
version ucla-lsv3
16
assessing loneliness
16
versions ucla-lsv3
16
loneliness individuals
12
concurrent validity
12
ucla-lsv3
9

Similar Publications

Introduction: Machine learning studies sometimes include a high number of predictors relative to the number of training cases. This increases the risk of overfitting and poor generalizability. A recent study hypothesized that between-trial heterogeneity precluded generalizable outcome prediction in schizophrenia from being achieved.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The objective of this study was to characterize real-world prescription patterns of antipsychotic drugs in patients with various psychiatric disorders with psychotic features.

Method: We analyzed the discharge prescription plans of 59,962 cases with the main diagnoses schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, acute transient psychotic disorder, delusional disorder, psychotic bipolar disorder, psychotic depression, organic delusional disorder or substance-induced psychosis. We analyzed the overall use, pharmacological subgroups, the use of long-acting injectable (LAI) formulations, and the frequency of prescription of the singular antipsychotic drugs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose/background: Schizophrenia is often associated with nonadherence to oral antipsychotic therapy, which increases the risk of relapse, hospitalization, and higher health care costs. To overcome this challenge, long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics, such as paliperidone palmitate, offer a solution by reducing relapse rates. Also, the bioequivalent formulations can enhance treatment accessibility while maintaining efficacy and safety.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: The study aim was to identify ethnoracial disparities in the prevalence of schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSDs) and positive psychotic symptoms in the United States and examine the role of social neighborhood inequities.

Methods: Participants in the Mental and Substance Use Disorders Prevalence Study, a national household sample of nonelderly adults (N=4,764), were assessed by clinicians with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 (SCID-5) for SSDs (past year and lifetime), including schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, and schizophreniform disorder, and for psychotic symptoms. Weighted logistic regression models estimated ethnoracial differences in the prevalence of SSDs and psychotic symptoms in unadjusted models, age- and sex-adjusted models, and models further adjusted for a neighborhood Social Vulnerability Metric (SVM) score, a composite index of five social determinants of health domains.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background And Hypothesis: Auditory hallucinations (AHs) affect 60-80 % of schizophrenia patients and often resist antipsychotic treatment. AHs involve superior temporal gyrus (STG) hyperactivity and disrupted auditory-cognitive control connectivity. Real-time fMRI neurofeedback (NFB) enables voluntary modulation of targeted brain regions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF