Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Objective: Test the effectiveness of benchmarked performance reports based on existing discharge data paired with a statewide intervention to implement evidence-based strategies on breast re-excision rates.

Background: Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is a common breast cancer surgery performed in a range of hospital settings. Studies have demonstrated variations in post-BCS re-excision rates, identifying it as a high-value improvement target.

Methods: Wisconsin Hospital Association discharge data (2017-2019) were used to compare 60-day re-excision rates following BCS for breast cancer. The analysis estimated the difference in the average change preintervention to postintervention between Surgical Collaborative of Wisconsin (SCW) and nonparticipating hospitals using a logistic mixed-effects model with repeated measures, adjusting for age, payer, and hospital volume, including hospitals as random effects. The intervention included 5 collaborative meetings in 2018 to 2019 where surgeon champions shared guideline updates, best practices/challenges, and facilitated action planning. Confidential benchmarked performance reports were provided.

Results: In 2017, there were 3692 breast procedures in SCW and 1279 in nonparticipating hospitals; hospital-level re-excision rates ranged from 5% to >50%. There was no statistically significant baseline difference in re-excision rates between SCW and nonparticipating hospitals (16.1% vs. 17.1%, P =0.47). Re-excision significantly decreased for SCW but not for nonparticipating hospitals (odds ratio=0.69, 95% confidence interval=0.52-0.91).

Conclusions: Benchmarked performance reports and collaborative quality improvement can decrease post-BCS re-excisions, increase quality, and decrease costs. Our study demonstrates the effective use of administrative data as a platform for statewide quality collaboratives. Using existing data requires fewer resources and offers a new paradigm that promotes participation across practice settings.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9529150PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000005590DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

re-excision rates
20
nonparticipating hospitals
16
benchmarked performance
12
performance reports
12
scw nonparticipating
12
breast-conserving surgery
8
discharge data
8
breast cancer
8
re-excision
7
rates
5

Similar Publications

Importance: Breast-conserving therapy (BCT) results in reoperation in ∼20 % of cases due to positive margins, and a 7-13 % recurrence risk at 5 years persists despite negative margins and radiation. Enhancing margin treatment is critical to reducing local recurrence and improving survival.

Objective: To optimize and evaluate the performance of a Saline-coupled Intraoperative Radiofrequency Ablation (SIRA) device in producing uniform 1 cm ablations in lumpectomy cavities and compare it to prior-generation RFA technology in previous clinical studies.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Achieving optimal surgical margins is critical in breast-conserving surgery (BCS) to reduce local recurrence (LR) and the need for re-excision. This meta-analysis evaluated the impact of intraoperative margin optimization strategies on key surgical and oncologic outcomes in patients who underwent BCS.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines, including six randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: We conducted a prospective, phase II trial in which a radiation tumor bed boost was delivered preoperatively instead of the standard postoperative approach for breast cancer patients. We hypothesized that a preoperative boost would result in a lower rate of re-excision and a shorter duration of locoregional therapy compared with a postoperative boost.

Methods: Patients in this trial (NCT04871516) received a boost of 13.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF