Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Currently, several biosimilars of low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) with differing potencies are being developed and marketed globally. Thus, it is important that the potency of each biosimilar LMWH be compared with its innovator's molecule. The present study aimed to determine the bioequivalence of biosimilar (Cloti-Xa™) and innovator (Clexane ) formulations of enoxaparin sodium (40 mg/0.4 ml) in healthy human volunteers. It was conducted as a single-dose, randomized, double-blind, two-period, two-treatment, two-sequence, crossover, balanced, pharmacodynamic study (NCT05265676). The participants were sequentially and randomly administered subcutaneous injections of Cloti-Xa™ (test) and Clexane (reference), separated by a one-week washout period. To assess the Anti-Xa & Anti-IIa activities, tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) release and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), blood samples were obtained at various timepoints upto 24 h after the drug administration. Bioequivalence was concluded if the two-sided 90% CI for the test to reference ratio of the population is within 80%-125% for each of the Ln-transformed values of A and AUEC for Anti-Xa and Anti-IIa. TFPI and aPTT data were submitted as supportive evidence. The study sample consisted of twenty-four male participants. The 90% CIs of A and AUEC for Anti-Xa activity were 105.50%-113.90% and 103.97%-112.08%, and for Anti-IIa activity were 106.56%-117.90% and 107.35%-124.86%, respectively. In addition, the 90% CI of the ratio of Anti-Xa/Anti-IIa activity falls within the acceptance criteria. TFPI and aPTT profiles were similar for both products. No serious adverse events were observed during the study. Conclusively, the results showed that Cloti-Xa™ and Clexane are bioequivalent and well-tolerated.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9237834PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prp2.979DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bioequivalence biosimilar
8
cloti-xa™ innovator
8
innovator clexane
8
single-dose randomized
8
randomized double-blind
8
double-blind two-period
8
two-period two-treatment
8
two-treatment two-sequence
8
two-sequence crossover
8
crossover balanced
8

Similar Publications

The objectives of this study were to compare the pharmacokinetics and safety profiles of the test (T) preparation (Ferric carboxymaltose injection, BrightGene Bio-Medical Technology Co. Ltd.) and reference (R) preparation (Ferinject, Vifor France) after intravenous injection in Chinese adult subjects with iron deficiency anemia (IDA) under fasting conditions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To evaluate the similarity of BAT2606 and mepolizumab, including pharmacokinetic profiles, immunogenicity, and safety, in healthy Chinese men.

Methods: This randomized, double-blind, parallel three-arm, single-dose Phase I clinical study enrolled 207 subjects. All subjects enrolled in this study were randomly assigned to receive BAT2606 or mepolizumab (European-sourced Nucala [Nucala-EU] and US-sourced Nucala [Nucala-US]) at a 1:1:1 ratio.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: The aim of this study was to investigate the pharmacokinetic bioequivalence between DMB-3115 and ustekinumab (EU-Stelara or US-Stelara) as well as the safety and immunogenicity of these drugs in healthy adult participants.

Methods: This was a randomized, double-blind, three-arm parallel-group study. Healthy participants aged 18-55 years were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive a single subcutaneous injection (45 mg) of either DMB-3115, EU-Stelara, or US-Stelara.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Efficacy and safety of bevacizumab biosimilar SIBP04 compared with bevacizumab (Avastin®) as first-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer: A randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial.

Cancer Pathog Ther

July 2025

Department of Medical Oncology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Clinical Study on Anticancer Molecular Targeted Drugs, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.

Background: SIBP04 is a biosimilar of bevacizumab (Avastin®, Roche, Basel, Switzerland). This study evaluated the equivalence of SIBP04 to Avastin® as first-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (nsqNSCLC).

Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, multi-center, phase 3 trial, we recruited patients with locally advanced or metastatic nsqNSCLC from 58 hospitals at China.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aim: This study compares the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) profiles of Insulin Aspart Injection IP/BP (Recombinant DNA origin) 100 IU/mL (Wockhardt Limited) and NovoRapid® Penfill® Insulin Aspart 100 IU/mL (Novo Nordisk A/S, Denmark) using a double-blind, randomized, single-center, two-period, crossover design in healthy subjects using euglycemic clamp technique.

Methods: A Total of 56 healthy subjects were enrolled in the study, received a single subcutaneous dose of 0.3 IU/kg of either the test or reference formulation on two separate occasions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF