A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Digital evaluation of Bolton's tooth size discrepancies among different malocclusions categories of Egyptian adolescent orthodontic population: A retrospective study. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Objective: This retrospective investigation aimed to compare Bolton's ratios among different malocclusion groups of Egyptian adolescent orthodontic patients with original Bolton's standards.

Materials And Methods: Pre-treatment dental casts of 588 Egyptian subjects, 290 males and 298 females with mean age 16.7±2.2 years, were randomly selected and classified into 220 class I (108 males and 112 females), 230 class II (112 males and 118 females), and 138 class III (68 males and 70 females) groups. Mesiodistal widths from first molar to first molar were measured on 3-dimensionally scanned models via software and ratios were calculated. Two-way analysis of variance compared ratios as a function of skeletal classification and gender. Additionally, percentages of significant discrepancy outside 2 standard deviations (SDs) were calculated.

Results: The anterior mean ratio for the total sample were higher (79.4±4.7) and overall mean ratio was lower (90.1±5) than Bolton's standards. The differences between the obtained and standard values were statistically significant (P<0.001). However, there were no significant differences in either anterior ratio (P=0.637) or overall ratio (P=295) regarding gender. Class I cases showed the highest mean anterior ratio of 80±5.7 whereas class II and class III cases had the lowest ratio of 78.5±4.6 and 78.7±3.5, respectively. Concerning overall ratio, class III subjects had the highest ratio of 91.8±2.6 with no substantial distinction from class II cases (90.2±4.7) but was significantly different from class I cases that demonstrated the lowest ratio (89.7±5, P=0.020). High percentages of patients displayed clinically significant tooth size discrepancies (TSD), exceeding either above or below 2SD of Bolton's values, which were more marked in the anterior ratio. These were 25.2% and 7.4% for anterior ratio and 3.4% and 15.4% for overall ratio.

Conclusions: Tooth size ratios of Egyptian orthodontic patients are generally different than the original Bolton's standards. Patients with class I and class III malocclusions had greater anterior and overall ratios than those with class II malocclusions with no considerable gender differences in either ratio.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2022.100660DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

egyptian adolescent
8
adolescent orthodontic
8
digital evaluation
4
bolton's
4
evaluation bolton's
4
bolton's tooth
4
tooth size
4
size discrepancies
4
discrepancies malocclusions
4
malocclusions categories
4

Similar Publications