Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: The specific 'active ingredients' through which neighborhood disadvantage increases risk for child psychopathology remains unclear, in large part because research to date has nearly always focused on poverty to the exclusion of other neighborhood domains. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether currently assessed neighborhood built, social, or toxicant conditions were associated with child externalizing psychopathology outcomes separately, and in a combined model, using data from the Detroit-metro county area.

Methods: We conducted principal components analyses for built, social, or toxicant conditions. Next, we fitted separate multiple regression models for each of the child externalizing psychopathology measures (oppositional defiant and conduct problems) as a function of built, social, or toxicant components.

Results: We found that built features (more non-profits, churches, and alcohol outlets, and less agriculture and vacant properties) were associated with conduct problems, while toxicant conditions (high percent industrial, toxins released and number of pre-1978 structures) were associated with oppositional defiance problems. There was no significant association between greenspace or social conditions and child externalizing outcomes. When examined simultaneously, only the significant independent association between built conditions and conduct problems remained.

Conclusions: Built, social, and toxicant neighborhood conditions are not interchangeable aspects of a given neighborhood. What's more, built features are uniquely associated with child externalizing outcomes independently of other neighborhood characteristics. Future research should consider how changes in the built conditions of the neighborhood (e.g., development, decay) serve to shape child externalizing behaviors, with a focus on identifying potentially actionable elements.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9145391PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13442-zDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

child externalizing
24
built social
20
social toxicant
20
toxicant conditions
16
conduct problems
12
built
9
neighborhood built
8
conditions
8
conditions child
8
externalizing behaviors
8

Similar Publications

Objective: Parental postpartum depression (PPD) is a documented risk factor for mental health problems in childhood, but little is known about its interplay with family socioeconomic status (SES). This study tested the interactive effect of SES in the associations of PPD with mental health symptoms in children from infancy to adolescence.

Method: Data used for this study were from the Quebec Longitudinal Study of Child Development.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To identify correlates of deliberate self-harm (DSH) in youth with autism and/or intellectual disability (ID).

Method: This retrospective longitudinal cohort analysis used claims data for youth ages 5 to 24 years continuously enrolled in Medicaid in a midwestern state for 6 months and diagnosed with autism and/or ID between 2010 and 2020 (N = 41,230). Cox proportional hazards regression examined associations between demographic and clinical variables and time to DSH for study cohorts with autism and/or ID.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Better movers, better friends? A test for the environmental stress hypothesis in typically developing primary school children.

Br J Dev Psychol

September 2025

Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, LEARN! Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Relations between children's motor skills and internalizing problems are poorly understood. The environmental stress hypothesis (ESH), originally developed for motor-impaired children, may provide understanding, yet has been scarcely examined in typically developing children. Therefore, we examined: (1) relations between children's motor skills and internalizing problems; (2) the role of secondary stressors, specifically interpersonal conflicts and externalizing problems; and (3) the role of personal resources, namely, prosocial behaviour and social self-efficacy (SSE).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF