Recalibrating Interpretations of Aldosterone Assays Across the Physiologic Range: Immunoassay and Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Measurements Under Multiple Controlled Conditions.

Context: Clinicians frequently rely on aldosterone thresholds derived from older immunoassays to diagnose primary aldosteronism. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is increasingly widespread and reported to yield lower aldosterone concentrations.

Objective: Given the health impact of incorrect interpretations of aldosterone levels, we compared measurements using LC-MS/MS and immunoassay across the full range of aldosterone physiology by evaluating distinct regulation by angiotensin II and adrenocorticotropin (ACTH).

Methods: Normotensive volunteers underwent prospective characterization of aldosterone production by immunoassay and LC-MS/MS during 4 conditions (n = 188): oral sodium suppression and restriction (to assess angiotensin II-mediated aldosterone production) and dexamethasone suppression and cosyntropin stimulation (to assess ACTH-mediated aldosterone production).

Results: Serum aldosterone concentrations by LC-MS/MS and immunoassay had a correlation of 0.69 ( < .001), with good agreement (intraclass correlation 0.76; 95% CI 0.52-0.87). Aldosterone was lower by LC-MS/MS than immunoassay (median 10.5 [3.8, 21.9] vs 19.6 [9.5, 28.0] ng/dL;  < .001), with an average difference of 37.2%. The most notable discrepancy was in the clinically discriminatory range <20 ng/dL: 9.9 (7.1, 13.8) ng/dL using immunoassay corresponded to 5.5 (1.4, 8.9) ng/dL by LC-MS/MS ( < .001). Following oral sodium suppression, the aldosterone-to-renin ratio was 4-fold higher using immunoassay (27.2 [19.7, 62.4] vs 6.4 [3.5, 19.1] ng/dL per ng/mL/hour;  < .001).

Conclusion: Aldosterone measurements are substantially lower by LC-MS/MS than immunoassay across the full physiologic range, especially when aldosterone levels were less than 20 ng/dL. These findings highlight the need to recalibrate diagnostic interpretations when measuring aldosterone via LC-MS/MS and provide insights into potential biologic causes of assay differences.