A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Lateral Nasal Artery Perforator Flap for Nasal Reconstruction: Clinical Applications and Risk Factors Associated With Nasal Deformities. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Nasal reconstruction is challenging because of the difficulty in balancing superior aesthetic outcomes and less invasive surgery. The use of the lateral nasal artery (LNA) perforator flap has been reported for nasal reconstruction. However, few reports have described appropriate applications of nasal reconstruction and assessments of nasal deformity. This study aimed to quantify the aesthetic outcomes on using this flap and reveal the risk factors associated with nasal deformities.

Methods: Twenty patients underwent nasal reconstruction using the LNA flap with a cranial perforator adjacent to the nasal defect. Postoperative protuberant deformities were scored by 2 independent plastic surgeons using a 5-point Likert scale and classified as excellent, good, or poor. The risk factors of deformities were identified using univariate analyses. A nasal alar deviation index was developed to analyze correlations with flap harvesting. The sensory function was assessed by the Semmes-Weinstein test.

Results: Flaps survived in 19 patients (95%), and 1 flap showed distal necrosis. All arterial perforators used remained within 5 mm lateral to the boundary between the cheek and nasal ala. The flaps were most often used to cover 2 subunits, including the nasal sidewall defects. Protuberant deformities in 6 (30%), 8 (40%), and 6 (30%) patients were classified as excellent, good, and poor, respectively. Nasal defects involving more than 3 subunits caused severe protuberant deformity. Only 2 patients (5%) in the good and fair groups underwent additional debulking surgery. Nasal alar deviation was not significantly correlated with flap harvesting, when the nasal alar deviation index before and after surgery were compared. Sensory function was retained in all patients.

Conclusions: Aesthetic outcomes and sensory function were good on using the LNA perforator flap as a propeller flap having a wide arc of rotation. This flap is suitable for nasal reconstruction involving less than 2 nasal subunits without any severe nasal alar deviation deformity. In addition, this flap allows for better outcomes because it requires less invasive 1-stage surgery.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000002906DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

nasal reconstruction
24
nasal
19
nasal alar
16
alar deviation
16
perforator flap
12
risk factors
12
aesthetic outcomes
12
sensory function
12
flap
11
lateral nasal
8

Similar Publications