Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

In the phase 3 MAIA study of patients with transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM), daratumumab plus lenalidomide/dexamethasone (D-Rd) improved progression-free survival (PFS) versus lenalidomide/dexamethasone (Rd). We present a subgroup analysis of MAIA by frailty status. Frailty assessment was performed retrospectively using age, Charlson comorbidity index, and baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score. Patients were classified as fit, intermediate, non-frail (fit + intermediate), or frail. Of the randomized patients (D-Rd, n = 368; Rd, n = 369), 396 patients were non-frail (D-Rd, 196 [53.3%]; Rd, 200 [54.2%]) and 341 patients were frail (172 [46.7%]; 169 [45.8%]). After a 36.4-month median follow-up, non-frail patients had longer PFS than frail patients, but the PFS benefit of D-Rd versus Rd was maintained across subgroups: non-frail (median, not reached [NR] vs 41.7 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.48; P < 0.0001) and frail (NR vs 30.4 months; HR, 0.62; P = 0.003). Improved rates of complete response or better and minimal residual disease (10) negativity were observed for D-Rd across subgroups. The most common grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse event in non-frail and frail patients was neutropenia (non-frail, 45.4% [D-Rd] and 37.2% [Rd]; frail, 57.7% and 33.1%). These findings support the clinical benefit of D-Rd in transplant-ineligible NDMM patients enrolled in MAIA, regardless of frailty status.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8979809PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41375-021-01488-8DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

transplant-ineligible newly
8
newly diagnosed
8
diagnosed multiple
8
multiple myeloma
8
subgroup analysis
8
analysis maia
8
patients
7
daratumumab lenalidomide
4
lenalidomide dexamethasone
4
dexamethasone transplant-ineligible
4

Similar Publications

Background: Real-world data on treatment outcomes for elderly transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma are limited. The difference in treatment subsidization in Australia compared with New Zealand enables comparison of bortezomib-cyclophosphamide-dexamethasone (VCd), lenalidomide-bortezomib-dexamethasone (VRd) with Rd maintenance, and continuous Rd.

Methods: Using data from the ANZ Myeloma and Related Diseases Registry, we evaluated 1092 patients over 70 years of age between February 2013 and February 2024.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

An increased risk of SPM (second primary malignancies) was reported for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma transplant ineligible (NDMM-TI) exposed to lenalidomide (Len), with the caveats that Len was often co-exposed to alkylating-agents and the studies did not exclude SyM (synchronous malignancies). We aimed to evaluate the respective SyM over SPM risks in NDMM-TI treated in front-line with Len. We conducted a high-resolution population-based cancer registry study, which allowed completeness of the primary endpoint (SyM and SPM) without reporting bias, and to guarantee a cohort more representative of real-life than clinical trials.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF