98%
921
2 minutes
20
Unlabelled: Direct detection of SARS-CoV-2 viral antigens could replace RT-PCR, provided that its clinical performance is validated in different epidemiological settings. Here, we evaluated the performance of the VITROS Antigen test, an enzyme immunoassay detecting a SARS-CoV-2 antigen, in NPSs from 3 cohorts of patients.
Methods: Three cohorts including SARS-CoV-2 RNA-positive samples collected during the first and second wave of the French epidemic between March 2020 and February 2021 (including variant B.1.1.7/α and variant B.1.351/β).
Results: Among the 1763 prospectively tested subjects, 8.2% (145/1763) were SARS-CoV-2 RNA-positive by RT-PCR. Using Ct ≤ 30 and Ct ≤ 35 as thresholds, the sensitivities of the antigen assay were 98.8% (93.6-100%) and 93.5% (87.0-97.3%), respectively. The overall specificity of the assay was 100% (1614/1614; 99.8-100%). In a retrospective cohort of subjects infected with variants of concern, 90.4% (47/52) of NPSs containing B. B.1.1.7/α (Ct ≤ 35) and 100% (7/7) of those containing B.1.351/β were positive with the VITROS EIA SARS-CoV-2 Antigen test.
Conclusion: The excellent performance of the EIA Antigen test reported here, including in patients infected with viral "variants of concern", support the use of high-throughput, EIA-based SARS-CoV-2 antigen assays as an alternative or complement to nucleic acid testing in order to scale-up laboratory screening and diagnostic capacities.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8628626 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2021.105048 | DOI Listing |
Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol
August 2025
Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, screening was initiated in several settings to mitigate asymptomatic transmission of SARS-CoV-2. However, this practice was later discouraged by the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. This single-center retrospective study demonstrates limited utility of SARS-CoV-2 screening tests in asymptomatic HCT and CAR T-cell patients.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFOpen Forum Infect Dis
September 2025
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Plasma samples obtained approximately 3 ( = 100) and 12 months ( = 78) after acute SARS-CoV-2 infection were tested for S1, spike, and N antigens. There were no significant differences in plasma proteins or single-cell protein expression levels on immune cells between those with and without plasma antigen detected.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFVirology
September 2025
Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Biological Resources and Genetic Engineering, College of Life Science and Technology, Xinjiang University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China. Electronic address:
Colloidal gold technology has revolutionized viral diagnostics through its rapid, cost-effective, and user-friendly applications, particularly in point-of-care testing (POCT). This review synthesizes recent advancements, focusing on its role in detecting respiratory viruses, hepatitis viruses, and emerging pathogens. The technology leverages the unique optical and physicochemical properties of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs), including localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) and high surface-to-volume ratios, to achieve rapid antigen-antibody recognition with visual readouts within 15 min.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAllergol Immunopathol (Madr)
September 2025
Jinnah Sindh Medical University, Karachi, Pakistan;
This letter offers constructive feedback of the study by Sağun et al. on changing allergen sensitivity in the COVID-19 pandemic. The data presented were very interesting concerning the changing rates of sensitization, but the authors neglected some important areas requiring further consideration.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAllergol Immunopathol (Madr)
September 2025
Faculty of Medicine, University of Prishtina, University Clinical Center of Kosovo, Prishtina, Republic of Kosovo.
Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the association between allergic reactions after COVID-19 vaccination and the history of high-risk allergy, individual predisposing factors such as age and gender, and COVID-19 vaccine type.
Materials And Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 234 adult patients (18 years old and above) who underwent a COVID-19 vaccine allergy test up until February 2023 in a Clinic of Allergy and Clinical Immunology in the University Clinical Center of Kosovo. All patients suspected of allergy underwent skin testing: SPT (skin prick test) and IDT (intradermal test) using either an mRNA (ribonucleic messenger acid) vaccine (BNT162b2, Pfizer-BioNTech) and/or an adenoviral vector vaccine (AZD1222, AstraZeneca).