98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is a cornerstone in the management of large (≥20 mm) non-pedunculated colorectal polyps. Clinically significant post-EMR bleeding occurs in 7% of cases and is most frequently encountered in the right colon. We aimed to assess the use of prophylactic clip closure in preventing clinically significant post-EMR bleeding within the right colon.
Methods: We conducted a randomised controlled trial at a tertiary centre in Australia. Patients referred for the EMR of large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps in the right colon were eligible. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) into the clip or control (no clip) group, using a computerised random-number generator. The primary endpoint was clinically significant post-EMR bleeding, defined as haematochezia necessitating emergency department presentation, hospitalisation, or re-intervention within 14 days post-EMR, which was analysed on the basis of intention-to-treat principles. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02196649, and has been completed.
Findings: Between Feb 4, 2016, and Dec 15, 2020, 231 patients were randomly assigned: 118 to the clip group and 113 to the control group. In the intention-to-treat analysis, clinically significant post-EMR bleeding was less frequent in the clip group than in the control group (four [3·4%] of 118 patients vs 12 [10·6%] of 113; p=0·031; absolute risk reduction 7·2% [95% CI 0·7-13·8]; number needed to treat 13·9). There were no differences between groups in adverse events, including delayed perforation (one [<1%] in the clip group vs one [<1%] in the control group) and post-EMR pain (four [3%] vs six [5%]). No deaths were reported.
Interpretation: Prophylactic clip closure can be performed following the EMR of large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps of 20 mm or larger in the right colon to reduce the risk of clinically significant post-EMR bleeding.
Funding: None.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(21)00384-8 | DOI Listing |
World J Gastrointest Surg
July 2025
Department of Gastroenterology, Beijing Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Beijing 100039, China.
Background: Endoscopic mucosa resection (EMR) is an important minimally invasive surgical method for treating early digestive tract tumors. In recent years, the crucial role of intestinal microbiota in disease occurrence and development has attracted increasing attention. However, the changes in intestinal microbiota after EMR and the effect of dietary fiber intervention on microbiota recovery remain insufficiently elucidated.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFTherap Adv Gastroenterol
July 2025
Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Background: There is insufficient evidence regarding the management of hematochezia after colorectal endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) without endoscopic hemostasis.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to develop an observable score for hematochezia after colorectal EMR.
Design: Retrospective study.
World J Gastroenterol
May 2025
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Federal Research Center of Nutrition, Biotechnology and Food Safety, Moscow 115446, Russia.
Colorectal cancer remains a major health concern, with colorectal polyps as key precursors. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is a common treatment, but recurrence rates remain high. Traditional surveillance strategies rely on polyp characteristics and completeness of the resection potentially missing key risk factors.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAm J Gastroenterol
January 2025
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Introduction: Data on the risk of post-polypectomy bleeding after endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) in patients with cirrhosis are limited.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study used the US Collaborative Network to assess post-polypectomy bleeding risk after colorectal EMR in patients with cirrhosis compared with controls. Using one-to-one propensity score matching, the primary outcome measured was bleeding within 30 days post-EMR.
Glob Health Action
December 2025
Department of Public Health, Global Health Section, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Background: Electronic medical record (EMR) systems are increasingly used to improve disease management. However, the impact on data quality, quality of care and clinical outcomes for type 1 diabetes (T1D) in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) has not yet been explored.
Objective: The aim was to evaluate the effect of implementing an EMR system on the quality of care and clinical outcomes for T1D individuals in Rwanda.