Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Growing demand for genetic counselling and testing has created a need for innovative service delivery models to provide quality care in an efficient manner. The goal of this study was to develop and evaluate a patient-facing webinar providing pre-test genetic counselling to individuals with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. A patient-facing webinar was developed and implemented between April 2019 and January 2021. It was evaluated using the Alberta Quality Matrix for Health framework, which considers the patient experience across the domains of effectiveness, appropriateness, acceptability, accessibility, and efficiency. The webinar group showed comparable scores to controls with regard to self-perceived knowledge and decisional conflict. The majority of patients reported that the webinar met their expectations and was an acceptable replacement for a 1:1 genetic counselling appointment. Finally, the webinar reduced genetic counsellor time to an average of 24 min per patient. Providing pre-test genetic counselling to index hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients via a group webinar has achieved a high quality of care, and optimized use of provider and space resources.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8582342PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12687-021-00564-xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

genetic counselling
20
hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
12
counselling testing
8
quality care
8
patient-facing webinar
8
providing pre-test
8
pre-test genetic
8
genetic
6
webinar
6
counselling
5

Similar Publications

Introduction: Congenital Hypogonadotropic Hypogonadism (CHH) arises from defects in the synthesis, secretion, or action of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH), resulting in incomplete or absent pubertal development and various non-reproductive features. CHH is genetically heterogeneous, with over 50 genes implicated in its pathogenesis. This study aimed to elucidate the genetic variants of CHH in a cohort of patients from a single-center endocrinology unit.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Perspectives on newborn screening for Fabry disease based on mothers' experiences in Japan.

J Genet Couns

October 2025

Department of Genetic Counseling, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan.

Newborn screening (NBS) for Fabry disease (FD) is an effective way to identify individuals with FD before the onset of symptoms, enabling early therapeutic treatment. The classic form of FD typically begins in early childhood or later, but the late-onset form often develops in adulthood. However, FD-NBS identifies positive cases regardless of the expected timing of symptom onset.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The 2022 Supreme Court of the United States' decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization eliminated federal abortion protections, returning abortion regulation to the states. However, in many states, abortion was already heavily restricted prior to this decision.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

With advances in next-generation sequencing technologies, individuals can seek genetic risk information for multiple conditions. However, feasibility and communication challenges could arise if offering multiple genetic tests simultaneously, such as cancer predisposition testing and carrier screening for pregnancy planning. Genetic screening introduces uncertainty from probabilistic results, ambiguous gene-disease associations, and complex variant interpretation, intertwining with psychosocial concerns impacting decision-making and emotional well-being.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Polygenic risk scores (PRS) are not yet standard in clinical risk assessments for familial breast cancer in Sweden. This study evaluated the distribution and impact of an established PRS (PRS) in women undergoing clinical sequencing for hereditary breast cancer.

Findings: We integrated PRS into a hereditary breast cancer gene panel used in clinical practice and calculated scores for 262 women.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF