Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Importance: Insurance status has been linked to important differences in cancer treatment and outcomes in the US. With more than 15 million individuals gaining health insurance through Medicaid expansion, there is an increasing need to understand the implications of this policy within the US cancer population. This review provides an overview of the fundamental principles and nuances of Medicaid expansion, as well as the implications for cancer care.

Observations: The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act presented states with an option to expand Medicaid coverage by broadening the eligibility criteria (eg, raising the eligible income level). During the past 10 years, Medicaid expansion has been credited with a 30% reduction in the population of uninsured individuals in the US. Such a significant change in the insurance profile could have important implications for the 1.7 million patients diagnosed with cancer each year, the oncology teams that care for them, and policy makers. However, several factors may complicate efforts to characterize the effect of Medicaid expansion on the US cancer population. Most notably, there is considerable variation among states in terms of whether Medicaid expansion took place, when expansion occurred, eligibility criteria for Medicaid, and coverage types that Medicaid provides. In addition, economic and health policy factors may be intertwined with factors associated with Medicaid expansion. Finally, variability in the manner in which cancer care has been captured and depicted in large databases could affect the interpretation of findings associated with expansion.

Conclusions And Relevance: The expansion of Medicaid was a historic public policy initiative. To fully leverage this policy to improve oncological care and to maximize learning for subsequent policies, it is critical to understand the effect of Medicaid expansion. This review aims to better prepare investigators and their audiences to fully understand the implications of this important health policy initiative.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.4323DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

medicaid expansion
32
medicaid
12
expansion
10
expansion cancer
8
cancer care
8
understand implications
8
cancer population
8
medicaid coverage
8
eligibility criteria
8
health policy
8

Similar Publications

Background: Political determinants of cancer risk are largely unexplored, conceptually and empirically.

Methods: Observational analysis of associations present in 2017-2021 between 5 state-level political metrics and 4 age-standardized cancer outcomes (regional and distant stage at diagnosis for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer among screening-age adults and premature cancer mortality), overall and in standardized linear regression models adjusting for state-level poverty and medical uninsurance.

Results: In fully adjusted models (adjusted for state-level poverty and state-level medical uninsurance variables: % working age adults [age 35-64] without medical insurance; number of years of state Medicaid expansion), each 1 SD shift toward a more liberal political ideology (measured by voting record) among elected officials in the US House of Representatives was associated with decreased risk of diagnosis with regional and distant breast and colorectal cancer (respectively: -0.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The Affordable Care Act expanded Medicaid eligibility for low-income adults who are not Medicare eligible while leaving in place states' more restrictive dual eligibility criteria. When Medicaid expansion enrollees turn 65 and transition to Medicare as their primary insurer, they may lose Medicaid and face higher premiums and out-of-pocket costs, yet there is little understanding of how older adults navigate this change in insurance programs.

Objective: To investigate the experiences of Medicaid expansion enrollees who transitioned to Medicare coverage at age 65.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Multiple federal policy changes since 2018 have been intended to increase buprenorphine prescribing in response to a persistent treatment gap for opioid use disorder in the US. Anticipated national increases did not occur, but highly variable state-level trends provide important insights. We used IQVIA data to examine all-payer and per payer prescribing across states during the period 2018-24.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

» Affordable Care Act Medicaid expansion increased orthopaedic surgery access and utilization among Medicaid patients, including for racial and ethnic minorities.» Despite improved coverage, Medicaid patients continue to face significant real-world barriers to orthopaedic care, including lower appointment success and longer wait times compared with privately insured patients.» Evidence on cost and quality impacts remains limited, with early signals of increased reimbursements, higher charges, and some quality improvements postexpansion.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

We assessed the association of participation in the Community Eligibility Provision, a universal free school meals policy in the United States, with school and area-level characteristics, and how these associations changed between 2014 and 2020. Using logistic regression models with district-clustered standard errors, in 53,391 eligible schools nationwide, adjusted prevalence of participation was 3.8 percentage points (pp) lower among high schools relative to elementary schools (95% CI: 1.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF