Minimal clinically important difference in means in vulnerable populations: challenges and solutions.

BMJ Open

Epidemiology and International Public Health, Bielefeld School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.

Published: November 2021


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Introduction And Motivation: Many health studies measure a continuous outcome and compare means between groups. Since means for biological data are often difficult to interpret clinically, it is common to dichotomise using a cut-point and present the 'percentage abnormal' alongside or in place of means. Examples include birthweight where 'abnormal' is defined as <2500 g (low birthweight), systolic blood pressure with abnormal defined as >140 mm Hg (high blood pressure) and lung function with varying definitions of the 'limit of normal'. In vulnerable populations with low means, for example, birthweight in a population of preterm babies, a given difference in means between two groups will represent a larger difference in the percentage with low birthweight than in a general population of babies where most will be full term. Thus, in general, the difference in percentage of patients with abnormal values for a given difference in means varies according to the reference population's mean value. This phenomenon leads to challenges in interpreting differences in means in vulnerable populations and in defining an outcome-specific minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in means since the proportion abnormal, which is useful in interpreting means, is not constant-it varies with the population mean. This has relevance for study power calculations and data analyses in vulnerable populations where a small observed difference in means may be difficult to interpret clinically and may be disregarded, even if associated with a relatively large difference in percentage abnormal which is clinically relevant.

Methods: To address these issues, we suggest both difference in means and difference in percentage (proportion) abnormal are considered when choosing the MCID, and that both means and percentages abnormal are reported when analysing the data.

Conclusions: We describe a distributional approach to analyse proportions classified as abnormal that avoids the usual loss of precision and power associated with dichotomisation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8578978PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052338DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

vulnerable populations
16
difference percentage
16
difference
10
minimal clinically
8
clinically difference
8
difficult interpret
8
interpret clinically
8
proportion abnormal
8
abnormal
6
vulnerable
4

Similar Publications

COVID-19 and the moral failure to protect the most vulnerable.

J Healthc Sci Humanit

January 2024

Director, Northern Plains Ethics Institute, Editor, Springer's International Library of Bioethics, Professor of Philosophy and Ethics, History, Philosophy, and Religious Studies-Dept. 2340, Minard Hall 422J, P.O Box 6050, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58108, [701] 231-7038, Email: dennis.

The USA's COVID-19 pandemic experience is an example of privileged thinking that what generally works for those in power ought to be the standard for what makes medical interventions, research, treatments, and policy ethical. As a result of not focusing on doing whatever was required for vulnerable or susceptible populations or their members to achieve their health and flourishing, there are a disproportionate numbers of COVID-19 infections and deaths in Black, Hispanic, and indigenous communities. Future studies will likely show even more harm and larger health failure than known of now.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Trust perception in Syrian refugee children.

Dev Psychopathol

September 2025

Youth Resilience Unit, Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

Trust judgments involve rapidly evaluating others' appearance and are critical in psychosocial development. Trust biases may be linked to psychopathology risk, particularly in vulnerable, adversity-affected populations, but very little is known about trust perception in refugee context. Here, we measured trust perception of Syrian refugee children ( = 324, = 6.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Enhanced obstetric training to address maternity care workforce shortages in tribal, rural, and underserved communities: a case from Oklahoma.

Healthc (Amst)

September 2025

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Community Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Schusterman Center, Tulsa, OK, USA.

The United States is facing a shortage of pregnancy care providers, especially in tribal, rural, and underserved (TRU) communities. In Oklahoma, more than half of the state's counties are considered maternity care deserts that lack obstetric (OB) providers or services. Limited access to pregnancy care in Oklahoma's TRU areas contributes to the state's high rates of maternal morbidity and mortality.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Little is documented on key community-based One Health (OH) approach implementation, pro-activeness and effectiveness of interactions and strategies against Mpox outbreak public health emergency in international concern (PHEIC) in various African countries in order to stamp out the persisting Mpox outbreak threat and burden. Prioritizing critical community-based interventions and lessons learned from previous COVID-19, Mpox, Ebola, COVID-19, Rift Valley Fever and Marburg virus outbreaks revealed critical shortcomings in funding, surveillance, and community engagement that plague public health initiatives across the continent. The article provides critical insights and benefits of community-based One Health approaches implementation against Mpox outbreak management in Africa.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF