Communicating uncertainty in epidemic models.

Epidemics

MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis & WHO Collaborating Centre for Infectious Disease Modelling, Abdul Latif Jameel Institute for Disease and Emergency Analytics, Imperial College London, St Mary's Campus, Norfolk Place, W2 1PG London, UK.

Published: December 2021


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

While mathematical models of disease transmission are widely used to inform public health decision-makers globally, the uncertainty inherent in results are often poorly communicated. We outline some potential sources of uncertainty in epidemic models, present traditional methods used to illustrate uncertainty and discuss alternative presentation formats used by modelling groups throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. Then, by drawing on the experience of our own recent modelling, we seek to contribute to the ongoing discussion of how to improve upon traditional methods used to visualise uncertainty by providing a suggestion of how this can be presented in a clear and simple manner.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8562068PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.epidem.2021.100520DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

uncertainty epidemic
8
epidemic models
8
traditional methods
8
communicating uncertainty
4
models mathematical
4
mathematical models
4
models disease
4
disease transmission
4
transmission inform
4
inform public
4

Similar Publications

Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS) is an early-onset cancer syndrome caused by pathogenic germline TP53 variants. Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with LFS may have challenges navigating new romantic partnerships given the significant effects of LFS on multiple life domains that also affect partners (e.g.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

AppRaise: Software for Quantifying Evidence Uncertainty in Systematic Reviews Using a Posterior Mixture Model.

J Eval Clin Pract

September 2025

Health Technology Assessment Unit, Acute and Hospital-Based Care Portfolio, Ontario Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Rationale: Systematic reviews are essential for evidence-based healthcare decision-making. While it is relatively straightforward to quantitatively assess random errors in systematic reviews, as these are typically reported in primary studies, the assessment of biases often remains narrative. Primary studies seldom provide quantitative estimates of biases and their uncertainties, resulting in systematic reviews rarely including such measurements.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

De-implementation of established practices is a common challenge in infection prevention and antimicrobial stewardship and a necessary part of the life cycle of healthcare quality improvement programs. Promoting de-implementation of ineffective antimicrobial use and increasingly of low-value diagnostic testing are cornerstones of stewardship practice. Principles of de-implementation science and the interplay of implementation and de-implementation are discussed in part I of this Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America White Paper Series.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) and injection drug use among young women are dramatically rising in the rural United States. From 2004 to 2017, heroin use among non-pregnant women increased 22.4% biennially, mirroring increases in HCV cases, especially among younger populations.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Ischemic cardiomyopathy is the leading cause of heart failure and associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The role of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in term of increasing survival and cardiovascular outcomes in ischemic cardiomyopathy remains unclear.

Purpose: To evaluate whether revascularization is associated with 30-day survival in ischemic cardiomyopathy in Dr.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF